The workflow produces a quick end-to-end video, but the free-plan watermark and generic app presentation keep it from being fully ad-ready without extra polish.
What was measured
Ad-readiness
Whether the final output is usable as a paid ad as-is, without obvious fixes or extra manual production.
decisive for this rankingtransformation
The key question is whether the finished asset is usable as a paid ad without obvious fixes; that is a direct measure of success here. (3 of 3 judges)
What was given, what came back
Test input: Duolingo – Mobile App · text
Input — what we sent
The exact prompt
Product URL: https://www.duolingo.com/ Exact Script Hook: Learning a new language has never been this easy. Script: I've been using Duolingo for a few minutes every day, and it's made language learning simple and fun. The short lessons are easy to follow, and the daily practice keeps me motivated. If you're planning to learn a new language, give Duolingo a try. Output Requirements - Vertical (9:16) - 20–30 seconds - UGC-style AI presenter - Natural AI voice - Captions enabled
A short-form UGC-style video ad prompt for a consumer mobile app, designed to test whether a tool can explain app benefits simply and persuasively in a social ad format.
Why this input is hard
- · mobile app understanding
- · consumer app promotion
- · script quality
- · avatar realism
- · voice quality
- · caption quality
- · overall ad readiness
Output — unretouched
Also checked on this input — same tool, 6 other criteria
Avatar realism✓ WorkedThe avatar looks realistic and holds attention well enough for a mobile-app ad, with speech and lip movements aligned naturally.Caption quality✓ WorkedCaptions are correctly generated and synced with the narration.Platform formats✓ WorkedThe generator outputs a short-form vertical video in 9:16 format suitable for TikTok, Reels, and Shorts.Product understanding⚠ StruggledThe output does not clearly showcase the app interface and relies on generic background context, which weakens app-specific product understanding and relatability.Script quality & persuasiveness◐ MixedThe narration is easy to understand and matches Duolingo's simple-learning vibe, but it is not especially energetic and the report notes minor phrasing drift.Voice quality◐ MixedThe voice is simple and clean and fits educational/app promotion content, but the delivery is described as slightly neutral rather than highly engaging.
Provenance
- Observation
- 26406644-49a2-4fa5-bec0-d68eeb948c7a
- Evidence run
- f91a51ec-b400-46fe-97f5-7e779fe17532
- Study
- Generate UGC-Style Video Ads With AI Avatars
- Research task
- 86baxegpg
- Tested at
- not recorded
- Source
- first-party
- Evidence state
- verified
- Proof shown
- input + output shown
- Cost / latency
- not captured
- Repeat run
- not captured
- Tester
- not captured
The last three rows are honest blanks, not placeholders — our capture has no field for them yet.
Query this
get_evidence({
tool: "creatify-ai"
})MCP · mcp.aidemos.com/api/mcp
Free with attribution.
Same input, same check — 4 other tools
measured on Ad-readiness
AKOOL◐ MixedThe platform exports a complete video, but the output remains generic enough that it would likely need polishing before paid use.Topview AI◐ MixedThe export is usable and vertical, but the flat delivery, missing app UI context, and realism issues limit paid-ad readiness.VEED◐ MixedThe export was clean and usable for professional platforms, but the workflow still needed extra editing to make the video more engaging.Vidnoz AI⚠ StruggledBecause the background is generic and the app interface is absent, the export would need further production work before paid-ad use.
This evidence is published in
From the same study (page rebuilt from a later run)
Real inputs and real outputs, no retouching · every cell queryable via API & MCP · aidemos.com