Reconstructs the bank statement into the requested nested JSON hierarchy, with distinct statement.metadata, account_holder.address, account, branch, statement_period, and balances objects rather than flat OCR text.

✓ Worked🧾 artifact-verifiedinput + output shownTest date not recordedLanding AI
What was measured
Schema Adherence

Does the output follow the supplied JSON schema hierarchy exactly, with correct nesting, field names, and data types?

decisive for this rankingtransformation

If the output does not match the requested JSON schema exactly, the extracted data cannot be reliably consumed or queried, so this is core to the task. (3 of 3 judges)

What was given, what came back

Test input: Bank Statement PDF · pdf · group: financial-document-extraction
Input — what we sent
Input file 1 — as supplied
Research media bank statement 2 jul.png
Research media bank statement 2 jul.png
Input file 2 — as supplied
Bank Statement PDF.pdf
Bank Statement PDF

A 4-page bank statement PDF with 51 transactions, balances, rewards, and disclaimer text, used to test schema-driven extraction of dense financial tables and multi-page continuity.

Why this input is hard
  • · Table extraction across 50+ transaction rows
  • · Multi-page continuity with BALANCE FORWARD bridges
  • · Structured metadata vs. free-text transaction descriptions
  • · Numerical accuracy for balances, deposits, withdrawals, and summaries
  • · Nested schema population for account, branch, balances, rewards, and disclaimers
Output — unretouched
Output 1
Output 1
Output 2
Output 2
Provenance
Observation
91f210ef-e7ef-4d23-a3c8-badb7719e663
Evidence run
ec4d736d-95f9-4c88-884c-e280435f7b7b
Study
Extract and query structured data from documents using natural language
Research task
86b9y25e5
Tested at
not recorded
Source
first-party
Evidence state
verified
Proof shown
input + output shown
Cost / latency
not captured
Repeat run
not captured
Tester
not captured

The last three rows are honest blanks, not placeholders — our capture has no field for them yet.

Query this
get_evidence({
  tool: "landing-ai",
  scenario: "financial-document-extraction"
})
MCP · mcp.aidemos.com/api/mcp
Free with attribution.
Same input, same check — 7 other tools
measured on Schema Adherence
Datalab✓ WorkedMaps the bank statement into the requested nested JSON hierarchy instead of flattening it into OCR text, and preserves field-level citation metadata on the extracted objects.Extend AI✓ WorkedThe bank output is rebuilt as nested JSON rather than raw OCR, with branch, account, rewards, balances, summary, and metadata objects populated under the requested statement root.LlamaParse✓ WorkedKeeps a nested statement schema intact, emitting separate metadata, account_holder, account, branch, statement_period, balances, transactions, summary, rewards, and disclaimers objects instead of flattening the document.Nanonets✓ WorkedIt preserves the requested nested schema directly in the output, populating structured objects such as statement, account, balances, transactions, summary, rewards, and disclaimers instead of flattening the document into OCR text.Reducto✓ WorkedReconstructs the bank statement into a nested JSON structure aligned to the requested schema, with document metadata, account, branch, statement period, transactions, summary, and rewards-style sections instead of flat OCR text.Retab✓ WorkedReconstructs dense statement OCR into the requested nested JSON hierarchy, populating separate statement, account_holder, account, branch, balances, transactions, rewards, and disclaimers objects instead of flattening everything into text.Unstract✓ WorkedPreserves the requested nested statement hierarchy instead of flattening it, with separate metadata, account_holder, account, branch, balances, transactions, summary, and other top-level sections.
Real inputs and real outputs, no retouching · every cell queryable via API & MCP · aidemos.com