The interrogation-room output retains the bindi and tight back hair correctly, and the report says harsh lighting reveals more skin texture with less over-smoothing than the other Input 1 scenes.
What was measured
Accessory & detail retention
Retention of specific features — bindi, hair texture, skin tone, jewellery.
decisive for this rankingtransformation
Small identifying details like jewellery, bindi, hair texture, and skin tone are part of maintaining a consistent character identity across generations. (3 of 3 judges)
What was given, what came back
Test input: Full frontal portrait · image
Input — what we sent
Input not captured
This run recorded no prompt or input file for the test, so we cannot show you what produced the result below. Capture gaps are tracked, not hidden.
Full frontal portrait reference image with fair skin, curly dark hair, bindi, gold jhumka earrings, and a green stone necklace. All features are clearly visible in good natural lighting, making it the easiest identity anchor for the tools.
Why this input is hard
- · Baseline identity preservation
- · Accessory retention
- · Best-case frontal face matching
- · Consistent character reuse across varied scenes
Output — unretouched
Also checked on this input — same tool, 8 other criteria
Expression accuracy✗ FailedThe desert-horse output does not match the prompted intensity and determination; the expression is neutral and composed instead.Expression accuracy✓ WorkedThe interrogation-room output matches the requested serious, guarded expression.Identity preservation✓ WorkedThe interrogation-room output is the strongest Input 1 match, with the eyes, nose, lips, and face shape closest to the reference across the Input 1 scenes.Identity preservation⚠ StruggledThe desert-horse output shows clear identity drift, with the eye shape, nose structure, jawline, and face proportions all differing from the reference.Identity preservation◐ MixedThe warm-cafe output keeps the subject recognisable but not exact; the report says eye colour shifts from black to brown and facial proportions are slightly altered.Scene compliance✓ WorkedThe warm-cafe output follows the prompt well, with the café environment, window lighting, outfit, and hairstyle all rendered correctly.Scene compliance◐ MixedThe interrogation-room output follows the harsh lighting, serious expression, formal clothing, tight back hair, and bindi, but it shows less body than the prompt specified.Scene compliance✓ WorkedThe desert-horse output follows the scene prompt well, including the black horse, desert setting, riding outfit, scarf, braided hair, and dynamic motion.
Provenance
- Observation
- 6650d49c-d987-49c9-861d-9cd900685ae5
- Evidence run
- 1dfb8fa4-f7f0-47dc-911b-7db3af467e9a
- Study
- Generate Consistent AI Characters Across Different Scenes and Poses
- Research task
- 86b96df11
- Tested at
- not recorded
- Source
- first-party
- Evidence state
- verified
- Proof shown
- input + output shown
- Cost / latency
- not captured
- Repeat run
- not captured
- Tester
- not captured
The last three rows are honest blanks, not placeholders — our capture has no field for them yet.
Query this
get_evidence({
tool: "imagineart"
})MCP · mcp.aidemos.com/api/mcp
Free with attribution.
Same input, same check — 2 other tools
measured on Accessory & detail retention
ChatGPT✓ WorkedPreserves all three named accessories in a frontal portrait with near-100% retention: the bindi, gold jhumka earrings, and green stone necklace stay visible, and the hair colour/texture remains consistent; the main trade-off is slightly over-smoothed skin texture.Leonardo AI⚠ StruggledIt drops the reference's natural curl pattern and smooths hair and skin detail into a more stylised finish.
This evidence is published in
Real inputs and real outputs, no retouching · every cell queryable via API & MCP · aidemos.com