It drops the reference's natural curl pattern and smooths hair and skin detail into a more stylised finish.
What was measured
Accessory & detail retention
Retention of specific features — bindi, hair texture, skin tone, jewellery.
decisive for this rankingtransformation
Small identifying details like jewellery, bindi, hair texture, and skin tone are part of maintaining a consistent character identity across generations. (3 of 3 judges)
What was given, what came back
Test input: Full frontal portrait · image
Input — what we sent
Input not captured
This run recorded no prompt or input file for the test, so we cannot show you what produced the result below. Capture gaps are tracked, not hidden.
Full frontal portrait reference image with fair skin, curly dark hair, bindi, gold jhumka earrings, and a green stone necklace. All features are clearly visible in good natural lighting, making it the easiest identity anchor for the tools.
Why this input is hard
- · Baseline identity preservation
- · Accessory retention
- · Best-case frontal face matching
- · Consistent character reuse across varied scenes
Output — unretouched
Also checked on this input — same tool, 5 other criteria
Expression accuracy✗ FailedIt does not translate an explicitly angry or guarded prompt into facial expression, defaulting to calm neutrality.Identity preservation⚠ StruggledThe tool can keep the café mood and pose while drifting the face enough that a frontal reference reads as a lookalike rather than the same person.Identity preservation✗ FailedIt can render the desert action scene cleanly while replacing the reference with a different character whose face, proportions and overall appearance no longer match.Identity preservation◐ MixedIt can keep a frontal character recognisable in a new scene, but the face is refined enough that the match is only moderate.Scene compliance◐ MixedIt can place the subject in a believable interrogation setup with the correct outfit, but the room stays too neat and loses the harsh institutional atmosphere.
Provenance
- Observation
- 2f9fb0e6-bf73-43da-9569-51dac9414373
- Evidence run
- 1dfb8fa4-f7f0-47dc-911b-7db3af467e9a
- Study
- Generate Consistent AI Characters Across Different Scenes and Poses
- Research task
- 86b96df11
- Tested at
- not recorded
- Source
- first-party
- Evidence state
- verified
- Proof shown
- input + output shown
- Cost / latency
- not captured
- Repeat run
- not captured
- Tester
- not captured
The last three rows are honest blanks, not placeholders — our capture has no field for them yet.
Query this
get_evidence({
tool: "leonardo-ai"
})MCP · mcp.aidemos.com/api/mcp
Free with attribution.
Same input, same check — 2 other tools
measured on Accessory & detail retention
ChatGPT✓ WorkedPreserves all three named accessories in a frontal portrait with near-100% retention: the bindi, gold jhumka earrings, and green stone necklace stay visible, and the hair colour/texture remains consistent; the main trade-off is slightly over-smoothed skin texture.ImagineArt✓ WorkedThe interrogation-room output retains the bindi and tight back hair correctly, and the report says harsh lighting reveals more skin texture with less over-smoothing than the other Input 1 scenes.
This evidence is published in
Real inputs and real outputs, no retouching · every cell queryable via API & MCP · aidemos.com