The report explicitly lists the tool as free/open source, with pricing given as `Free - $0 - Open Source`.
What was measured
Bonus: Unique or Anomalous Behaviors
Captures distinctive tool-specific behavior worth noting, positive or negative, that does not fit the main criteria.
transformation
What was given, what came back
Input — what we sent
No input — this is a capability finding
The observation is about the tool itself rather than one test input, so there is nothing to show on this side by design.
Output — unretouched
No output artifact
The verdict rests on the tester's written observation alone — no file was captured for this cell.
Provenance
- Observation
- 561ee59b-8cd4-45ba-b661-482b85943121
- Evidence run
- 723182be-ace6-41cc-afa9-0772af8566c0
- Study
- PDF to markdown using open source libraries
- Research task
- 86ban5kjq
- Tested at
- not recorded
- Source
- first-party
- Evidence state
- observed
- Proof shown
- no artifact
- Cost / latency
- not captured
- Repeat run
- not captured
- Tester
- not captured
The last three rows are honest blanks, not placeholders — our capture has no field for them yet.
Query this
get_evidence({
tool: "docling"
})MCP · mcp.aidemos.com/api/mcp
Free with attribution.
Same input, same check — 0 other tools
measured on Bonus: Unique or Anomalous Behaviors
No other tool was measured on this criterion for this input.
This evidence is published in
Real inputs and real outputs, no retouching · every cell queryable via API & MCP · aidemos.com