It silently downgraded to 1080×1918 instead of true 4K, and the close crop looks soft rather than 4K-sharp.

✗ Failed🧾 artifact-verifiedinput + output shownTest date not recordedInVideo AI
What was measured
Output resolution

Does it maintain the input resolution or downscale?

context, not decisivetransformation

Keeping full resolution is important for delivery quality, but it is a downstream output constraint rather than the main background-removal task itself. (3 of 3 judges)

What was given, what came back

Test input: Busy Urban Street · video · group: remove-or-replace-video-backgrounds-using-ai
Input — what we sent
Input file 1 — as supplied
Input file 2 — as supplied
Busy Urban Street

A video of a person walking through a busy city street with multiple people, moving vehicles, and a visually complex urban background. It was used to stress segmentation and tracking under heavy background distraction and continuous motion.

Why this input is hard
  • · Complex background segmentation
  • · Handling background distractions
  • · Subject tracking
  • · Temporal consistency across frames
  • · Edge accuracy during continuous movement
Output — unretouched
Provenance
Observation
3864adc7-cb96-44b3-8872-55416a31c961
Evidence run
10155228-7ce8-438a-a210-547331ef080b
Study
Remove or Replace Video Backgrounds Using AI
Research task
86ba42c2d
Tested at
not recorded
Source
first-party
Evidence state
verified
Proof shown
input + output shown
Cost / latency
not captured
Repeat run
not captured
Tester
not captured

The last three rows are honest blanks, not placeholders — our capture has no field for them yet.

Query this
get_evidence({
  tool: "invideo-ai",
  scenario: "remove-or-replace-video-backgrounds-using-ai"
})
MCP · mcp.aidemos.com/api/mcp
Free with attribution.
Same input, same check — 5 other tools
measured on Output resolution
Real inputs and real outputs, no retouching · every cell queryable via API & MCP · aidemos.com