On the clean resume, it still misses a listed task bullet ('Evaluated 10+ AI/ML APIs...') and does not return CGPA.

◐ Mixed🧾 artifact-verifiedinput + output shownTest date not recordedHrFlow
What was measured
Accuracy

Are extracted values correct and complete?

decisive for this rankingtransformation

Correct and complete values are the essence of resume parsing, so this directly determines whether the tool succeeds. (3 of 3 judges)

What was given, what came back

Test input: Clean single-column resume — Rugved Nichite · pdf · group: resume-parsing
Input — what we sent
Input file 1 — as supplied
Input file 1 — as supplied
Input file 2 — as supplied
parseur-input1-rugved-nichite-cleanresume-d776e5470f6f.pdf
Clean single-column resume — Rugved Nichite

A professionally structured single-column resume for Rugved Nichite, used as the baseline input for parser accuracy across standard resume fields.

Why this input is hard
  • · baseline field extraction
  • · contact info accuracy
  • · work experience parsing
  • · education and CGPA extraction
  • · skills and certifications extraction
Output — unretouched
research-media-hrflow-20output-201-9f17ceb5aef8.txt
Loading file...
Provenance
Observation
372b36f6-3720-49f7-82fe-e7e711582fd1
Evidence run
cbbef4db-964c-49fa-a57f-a2977822bdfc
Study
Parse resumes into structured data using an API
Research task
86b9jm30n
Tested at
not recorded
Source
first-party
Evidence state
verified
Proof shown
input + output shown
Cost / latency
not captured
Repeat run
not captured
Tester
not captured

The last three rows are honest blanks, not placeholders — our capture has no field for them yet.

Query this
get_evidence({
  tool: "hrflow",
  scenario: "resume-parsing"
})
MCP · mcp.aidemos.com/api/mcp
Free with attribution.
Same input, same check — 9 other tools
measured on Accuracy
Real inputs and real outputs, no retouching · every cell queryable via API & MCP · aidemos.com