Fish Audio icon
audio-speech

Fish Audio

Reliable English voice cloning from noisy or clean samples, with useful controls; Hindi output was unreliable in this test.

English voice cloningHindi testedAuto-tag controlsFree tier 500 chars
TL;DR — our verdictUpdated August 2026 · 6 test artifacts

Strong English clone, weak Hindi follow-through

Where it wins
  • You want strong English voice cloning from a short sample, even if the source recording is noisy.
  • You want a useful generation control panel with model selection, normalization, speed, and auto-tagging.
  • You want outputs that are already natural enough to use without hunting for a lucky variant.
Main limitation
  • You need reliable Hindi voiceover from an English source sample.
Pricing (verified plans)
Free Tier $0/moPlus $5.5/mo or $15; $66 billed annuallyPro $37.5/mo or $100; $450 billed annuallyMax $749/mo or $999; $8,988 billed annually
Strongest test artifacts

Feature scores on this page: 9.0/10 (1 scored feature)

Our take

Fish Audio was the strongest English voice-cloning option in this test: it matched the source closely on both noisy and clean samples, sounded natural, and stayed consistent across repeat runs. The main caveat is multilingual use — Hindi pronunciation broke down enough that it was not reliable from an English source sample.

Fish Audio web app screen recording on Create Voice → Instant Voice Clone, showing an uploaded low-quality voice sample moving into audio analysis.

In-Depth Review

Our detailed analysis of Fish Audio — features, performance, and real-world testing.

AD
AI Demos Team
Expert Reviewer
Verified Review

Feature-by-Feature Breakdown

Voice Cloning and Voiceover Generation
Strongest English voice match in the test set
9/10
Test Summary
Feature tested: Voice Cloning and Voiceover Generation
Result: Partial (9/10) — Strongest English voice match in the test set

Feature tested: Voice Cloning and Voiceover Generation

Result: Partial (9/10)

Verdict: Strongest English voice match in the test set

Expected behavior: Clones or generates spoken output from provided voice/text inputs, exercised here on short English samples and Hindi script input. The cards show the tool producing English voiceover from a sample and attempting Hindi voiceover generation as multilingual speech output.

Test case: Audio file → Audio file

Input type: Audio file

Input used: Input artifact (Audio file): Low-quality voice sample — fishaudio_lowquality_input.wav

Observed output: Output artifact (Audio file): Strong, close match to the original input; a clear step up from earlier tools on the same sample, with no robotic quality. — low-quality-input-output-1.mp3

Input artifact: Input artifact (Audio file): Low-quality voice sample — fishaudio_lowquality_input.wav

Output artifact: Output artifact (Audio file): Strong, close match to the original input; a clear step up from earlier tools on the same sample, with no robotic quality. — low-quality-input-output-1.mp3

What changed: Audio file transformed into Audio file

Test case: Audio file → Audio file

Input type: Audio file

Input used: Input artifact (Audio file): Low-quality voice sample — fishaudio_lowquality_input.wav

Observed output: Output artifact (Audio file): Consistent with Output 1; equally strong match to the source voice and usable as-is. — low-quality-input-output-2.mp3

Input artifact: Input artifact (Audio file): Low-quality voice sample — fishaudio_lowquality_input.wav

Output artifact: Output artifact (Audio file): Consistent with Output 1; equally strong match to the source voice and usable as-is. — low-quality-input-output-2.mp3

What changed: Audio file transformed into Audio file

Test case: Audio file → Audio file

Input type: Audio file

Input used: Input artifact (Audio file): High-quality voice sample — fishaudio_highquality_input.wav

Observed output: Output artifact (Audio file): Fully matching the uploaded input; pitch, pauses, and overall delivery felt genuinely human, with one word mispronounced in roughly 2–3% of the output. — high-quality-input-output-1.mp3

Input artifact: Input artifact (Audio file): High-quality voice sample — fishaudio_highquality_input.wav

Output artifact: Output artifact (Audio file): Fully matching the uploaded input; pitch, pauses, and overall delivery felt genuinely human, with one word mispronounced in roughly 2–3% of the output. — high-quality-input-output-1.mp3

What changed: Audio file transformed into Audio file

Test case: Audio file → Audio file

Input type: Audio file

Input used: Input artifact (Audio file): High-quality voice sample — fishaudio_highquality_input.wav

Observed output: Output artifact (Audio file): Same strong accuracy as Output 1; equally human-like delivery and no notable issues, confirming the result was repeatable. — high-quality-input-output-2.mp3

Input artifact: Input artifact (Audio file): High-quality voice sample — fishaudio_highquality_input.wav

Output artifact: Output artifact (Audio file): Same strong accuracy as Output 1; equally human-like delivery and no notable issues, confirming the result was repeatable. — high-quality-input-output-2.mp3

What changed: Audio file transformed into Audio file

Test case: Text/code file → Audio file

Input type: Text/code file

Input used: Input artifact (Text/code file): Hindi script input — fishaudio_hindi_script_input.txt

Observed output: Output artifact (Audio file): Hindi script input generated audio, but pronunciation broke down noticeably and speaker identity was largely lost. — multilingual-input-output-1.mp3

Input artifact: Input artifact (Text/code file): Hindi script input — fishaudio_hindi_script_input.txt

Output artifact: Output artifact (Audio file): Hindi script input generated audio, but pronunciation broke down noticeably and speaker identity was largely lost. — multilingual-input-output-1.mp3

What changed: Text/code file transformed into Audio file

Test case: Text/code file → Audio file

Input type: Text/code file

Input used: Input artifact (Text/code file): Hindi script input — fishaudio_hindi_script_input.txt

Observed output: Output artifact (Audio file): Consistent with Output 1; Hindi pronunciation remained unreliable and the cloned identity did not hold up. — multilingual-input-output-2.mp3

Input artifact: Input artifact (Text/code file): Hindi script input — fishaudio_hindi_script_input.txt

Output artifact: Output artifact (Audio file): Consistent with Output 1; Hindi pronunciation remained unreliable and the cloned identity did not hold up. — multilingual-input-output-2.mp3

What changed: Text/code file transformed into Audio file

Why it matters / Conclusion: Strongest English clone in the test set and usable without compromise on both noisy and clean samples.

Clones or generates spoken output from provided voice/text inputs, exercised here on short English samples and Hindi script input. The cards show the tool producing English voiceover from a sample and attempting Hindi voiceover generation as multilingual speech output.

audio
0:00 / 0:00
Loading audio...
audio
0:00 / 0:00
Loading audio...
Strong, close match to the original input; a clear step up from earlier tools on the same sample, with no robotic quality.
audio
0:00 / 0:00
Loading audio...
audio
0:00 / 0:00
Loading audio...
Consistent with Output 1; equally strong match to the source voice and usable as-is.
audio
0:00 / 0:00
Loading audio...
audio
0:00 / 0:00
Loading audio...
Fully matching the uploaded input; pitch, pauses, and overall delivery felt genuinely human, with one word mispronounced in roughly 2–3% of the output.
audio
0:00 / 0:00
Loading audio...
audio
0:00 / 0:00
Loading audio...
Same strong accuracy as Output 1; equally human-like delivery and no notable issues, confirming the result was repeatable.
file
fishaudio_hindi_script_input.txt
Loading file...
audio
0:00 / 0:00
Loading audio...
Hindi script input generated audio, but pronunciation broke down noticeably and speaker identity was largely lost.
file
fishaudio_hindi_script_input.txt
Loading file...
audio
0:00 / 0:00
Loading audio...
Consistent with Output 1; Hindi pronunciation remained unreliable and the cloned identity did not hold up.
Bottom Line
Strongest English clone in the test set and usable without compromise on both noisy and clean samples.
From our researchearlier researchClone Your Voice and Generate Voiceover from Text
Voice Generation Controls
Genuinely useful control panel, not a black box
Test Summary
Feature tested: Voice Generation Controls
Result: Passed — Genuinely useful control panel, not a black box

Feature tested: Voice Generation Controls

Result: Passed

Verdict: Genuinely useful control panel, not a black box

Expected behavior: Exposes generation-time controls for shaping spoken output, including model selection, volume, speed, loudness normalization, text normalization, and auto-tagging. The member cards exercise these knobs as a reusable control surface rather than a single end-to-end voice task.

Test case: Text prompt → Text prompt

Input type: Text prompt

Input used: Input artifact (Text prompt): Control-panel observation from English cloning runs

Observed output: Output artifact (Text prompt): Observed control set

Input artifact: Input artifact (Text prompt): Control-panel observation from English cloning runs

Output artifact: Output artifact (Text prompt): Observed control set

What changed: Text prompt transformed into Text prompt

Test case: Text prompt → Text prompt

Input type: Text prompt

Input used: Input artifact (Text prompt): Control-panel observation from multilingual run

Observed output: Output artifact (Text prompt): Observed control set

Input artifact: Input artifact (Text prompt): Control-panel observation from multilingual run

Output artifact: Output artifact (Text prompt): Observed control set

What changed: Text prompt transformed into Text prompt

Why it matters / Conclusion: Useful control surface, with model selection and auto-tagging as the most practical levers.

Exposes generation-time controls for shaping spoken output, including model selection, volume, speed, loudness normalization, text normalization, and auto-tagging. The member cards exercise these knobs as a reusable control surface rather than a single end-to-end voice task.

INPUT
Fish Audio voice cloning run on a short English sample with model selection, speed, volume, normalization, and auto-tagging available.
OUTPUT
Model selection (S1, S1 mini, S2.1) was the standout control; the UI also supported volume, speed, loudness normalization, text normalization, and an auto-tag mode that applies emotion/delivery tags automatically.
INPUT
Fish Audio multilingual generation run using the same control panel.
OUTPUT
The same control set carried over to the multilingual run, but it did not fix Hindi pronunciation; the limitation was in the language output rather than the control panel.
Bottom Line
Useful control surface, with model selection and auto-tagging as the most practical levers.
From our researchClone Your Voice and Generate Voiceover from Text

Choose Your Plan

Unleash your creativity with unlimited generations

Free Tier
$0/mo
No credit card needed; 8,000 credits monthly; up to 7 minutes generation; up to 500 characters per generation; 3 public voice slots; standard generation speed; no enhanced voice cloning; no commercial use.
Plus
$5.5/mo or $15; $66 billed annually
For creators and professionals; 250,000 credits monthly; up to 20 minutes generation; up to 15,000 characters per generation; unlimited public + 10 private voice slots; priority generation on the latest models; 1 professional voice slot; enhanced voice cloning; commercial use allowed.
Pro
$37.5/mo or $100; $450 billed annually
Popular; for power users and businesses; 2,000,000 credits monthly; up to 1,620 minutes generation; 3 team seats included; up to 30,000 characters per generation; unlimited voice slots; 5 professional voice slots; 7 days money back guarantee; includes everything in Plus.
Max
$749/mo or $999; $8,988 billed annually
For teams with large-scale production needs; 25,000,000 credits monthly; up to 6,250 minutes generation; 10 team seats included; 15 professional voice slots; includes everything in Pro.
Enterprise
Custom
Volume pricing billed annually; pay as you go with organization-level controls; zero data retention; on-premise deployment; SOC2 compliance; more discount; custom SSO coming soon.

Pricing and limits were shown in the screenshot; annual billing and organization controls are included on higher tiers.

✓ Use This If
You want strong English voice cloning from a short sample, even if the source recording is noisy.
You want a useful generation control panel with model selection, normalization, speed, and auto-tagging.
You want outputs that are already natural enough to use without hunting for a lucky variant.
✕ Skip This If
You need reliable Hindi voiceover from an English source sample.
You need long-form output on the free plan beyond the 500-character limit.
You need multilingual identity preservation as a must-have rather than a best-effort feature.
audio-speechtext-to-speechaudioCreatorEditorTeacher
Very well. The low-quality sample still produced a strong, close English match that the reviewer described as usable without compromise.
Yes, but only slightly. The clean sample produced the cleanest pronunciation result in the report, yet the noisy sample was already strong enough to be usable.
Yes. The repeated outputs for the same input stayed similarly strong, which the reviewer used as a consistency check.
It can generate Hindi audio, but this test found the pronunciation unreliable and the cloned identity much weaker than in English.
The report observed model selection (S1, S1 mini, S2.1), speed, volume, loudness normalization, text normalization, and an auto-tag mode that applies emotion and delivery tags automatically.
Yes. The screenshot showed a free tier with 8,000 credits per month, up to 7 minutes of generation, and a 500-character limit per generation.
The screenshot showed Free Tier, Plus, Pro, Max, and Enterprise plans, with Enterprise listed as custom pricing.

Banner Preview

How the embed badge will look on your site

Fish Audio featured on AI Demos

Embed HTML

Copy this code to your website source

<a target="_blank" href="https://aidemos.com/tools/fish-audio?utm_source=fish-audio_embed" style="width: 250px; height: 80px; border-radius:4px;" width="250" height="80"> <img src="https://aidemos-website-images.s3.amazonaws.com/featured.png" alt="Fish Audio | Featured on AI Demos" style="width: 250px; height: 80px; border-radius:4px;" width="250" height="80"> </a>

Quick Integration Guide

  • 1Copy the HTML code block above.
  • 2Paste it into your site's HTML or CMS editor.
  • 3Banner appears instantly on your page.
  • 4Links back to your tool profile here.
Similar Tools

Similar Tools

Discover more AI tools like Fish Audio to enhance your workflow.

Comments (0)

Please Log in to join the discussion.

Built by FutureSmart AI — the team behind AI Demos

Need a custom AI solution for this use case?

If you are looking to build a custom voice cloning, text-to-speech, or audio dubbing system for your business or internal workflow, email us at contact@futuresmart.ai.

Get a custom build

Found something inaccurate or missing? We try to keep our AI research accurate and useful. If you found outdated information, an issue, or have a suggestion, email us at collaborate@aidemos.com.

Back to Top