Can LlamaParse extract a legitimately empty set?
LlamaParse passed this empty-set extraction case. It returned an empty required array for the damage-exceptions field, with the source page saying nothing was reported and no invented member or marker text added.
1 of 1 test case passed
Every test case in this scenario has a result.
The test case
Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above counts this row.
Legitimately empty setPassEvidence
{ "file_input": "23925ee0-6042-488c-a820-f90cecaaf05e", "id": "ext-qbmf1xx9w4ss27cwnwbldhj8xvn3", "project_id": "205fc038-050f-4b9d-9896-b404e84e1434", "configuration_id": null, "configuration": null, "status": "COMPLETED", "error_message": null, "extract_result": { "damage_exceptions": [] }, "extract_metadata": { "field_metadata": { "document_metadata": {}, "page_metadata": null, "row_metadata": null }, "parse_job_id": "pjb-d86uzytwhul5lajcvaieftlew2o5", "parse_tier": "agentic" }, "metadata": null, "grounded_items": null, "usage": null, "created_at": "2026-10-12T12:03:15.460053Z", "updated_at": "2026-10-12T12:03:26.391639Z", "document_input_value": "23925ee0-6042-488c-a820-f90cecaaf05e" }
JSON result with an empty damage-exceptions array
Copied from Output file (JSON), lines 9–11
Open the JSON file ↗| ✓ | Expected: Zero members in the required array.Found: The product returned an empty array with no invented member or marker text. |
The tool’s response is printed above, under What the tool returned. Show this screenshot
Open original ↗The tool’s response is printed above, under What the tool returned. Show this screenshot
Open original ↗The document said nothing was reported, and the product returned an empty required array instead of inventing a member or turning the marker sentence into data.
No citation. The empty field has no source citation in the extraction metadata.
Timing gap. The job's created and updated timestamps are 10.9 seconds apart.
Only one field is visible in the captured result panel; the rest are not shown.
The screenshot shows only the damage-exceptions field; other schema fields are not shown.
Configuration and setup
How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.
How this scenario is graded
How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.
Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.
- Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
- Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the row says which and quotes the tool.
- Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the row says what's missing.
Where this sits in the benchmark
This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.
| Level | Name | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | Structured Document Extraction → | 19 scenarios · 10 tools |
| Capability | Nested & Repeated Fields → | |
| Scenario | The set is legitimately empty → | |
| Tool | LlamaParse → |
Global scenario definition → · Global capability definition → · LlamaParse product page →
History of this result
What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.
Act on this result
Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.
You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.
Agree →Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.
Disagree →Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.
Report an issue →Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.
Vendor notice →The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.
Verify the proof files
These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.
File fingerprints (SHA-256)
A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.