Can Landing AI process scanned pages inside a mixed digital PDF?
Landing AI failed this mixed digital-and-scanned PDF case. All four fields came back, and the scanned-page values were exact, but the total due returned as "#1,246.80" even though the page text and rendering show "£1,246.80"; the run also carried both parse and extract ids.
1 of 1 test case failed
Every test case in this scenario has a result.
The test case
Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.
Values on both digital and scanned pagesFailEvidence
{ "data": { "total_due": "#1,246.80", "received_by": "J. Whitlock", "vehicle_registration": "LR19 KVM", "line_item_description": "Dosing pump, 240V, Chemical feed tubing, 10m coil, Inline flow sensor" }, "extractionMetadata": { "total_due": { "value": "#1,246.80", "ranges": [ { "start": 1815, "end": 1824 }, { "start": 761, "end": 788 } ] }, "received_by": { "value": "J. Whitlock", "ranges": [ { "start": 969, "end": 986 } ] }, "vehicle_registration": { "value": "LR19 KVM", "ranges": [ { "start": 839, "end": 869 } ] }, "line_item_description": { "value": "Dosing pump, 240V, Chemical feed tubing, 10m coil, Inline flow sensor", "ranges": [ { "start": 1331, "end": 1348 }, { "start": 1425, "end": 1455 }, { "start": 1531, "end": 1549 }, { "start": 885, "end": 918 } ] } }, "extract_id": "extract-01m4an9njhahxsteszb434cx21", "parse_run_id": "parse-01m4an8yxeaj98q65443v587vd", "created_at": "2026-10-07T07:47:32.265Z" }
Output JSON: all four fields and parse/extract ids
Copied from Output file (JSON), lines 2–7
Open the JSON file ↗| ✗ | Expected: Return all requested values from both page types.Found: All four values were returned. The scanned-page values were exact, but the total due came back with "#" instead of "£", and no uncertainty was reported. |
The tool’s response is printed above, under What the tool returned. Show this screenshot
Open original ↗The case required values from both page types. The scanned-page values were exact, but the total due came back as "#1,246.80" even though the page shows "£1,246.80", so the mixed-page extraction fails.
Merged descriptions. The three goods-table descriptions were merged into one string in the description field.
Configuration and setup
How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.
How this scenario is graded
How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.
Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.
- Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
- Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
- Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.
Where this sits in the benchmark
This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.
| Level | Name | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | Structured Document Extraction → | 19 scenarios · 10 tools |
| Capability | OCR → | |
| Scenario | A document mixing digital and scanned pages → | |
| Tool | Landing AI → |
Global scenario definition → · Global capability definition → · Landing AI product page →
History of this result
What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.
Act on this result
Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.
You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.
Agree →Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.
Disagree →Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.
Report an issue →Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.
Vendor notice →The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.
Verify the proof files
These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.
File fingerprints (SHA-256)
A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.