Does Quizgecko grade fixed-answer questions accurately when answers are mixed right and wrong?
Quizgecko graded the mixed fixed-answer attempt correctly. Live question views and the results table distinguished correct from incorrect answers, and the final score matched the row-by-row judgments at 17 of 53 correct, or 32%.
1 of 1 test case passed
Every test case in this scenario has a result.
The test case
Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.
Mixed correct and incorrect fixed answersPassEvidence
Input 1: “A: ammeter; V: voltmeter”
Input 2: “A point where the circuit must contain a switch”
Input 3: “The removal creates a break, so a complete loop no longer exists.”
Input 4: “The lamp goes out because the loop is broken at a different point.”
Input 5: “$0.09\,\mathrm{A}$”
Input 6: “The learner will conclude that every component is in series.”
Input 7: “The positions of the components relative to the laboratory bench”
Input 8: “They are drawn beside one another regardless of their electrical connections.”
Input 9: “The lamps are brighter because both receive the full battery potential difference.”
Input 10: “Each parallel lamp receives the full battery potential difference.”
Input 11: “All lamps in one series loop with one switch”
Response 1 answers Input 1.
Response 2 answers Input 2.
Response 3 answers Input 3.
Response 4 answers Input 4.
Response 5 answers Input 5.
Response 6 answers Input 6.
Response 7 answers Input 7.
Response 8 answers Input 8.
Response 9 answers Input 9.
Response 10 answers Input 10.
Response 11, the final response, answers Input 11.
Incorrect | All lamps on separate parallel branches with a switch in each branch
Transcribed from Proof 5 · Screenshot
Every message the tool sent, in order (12)
- Response to input 1
Correct | A: ammeter; V: voltmeter
- Response to input 2
Incorrect | A point where wires are electrically joined
- Response to input 3
Correct | The removal creates a break, so a complete loop no longer exists.
- Response to input 4
Correct | The lamp goes out because the loop is broken at a different point.
- Response to input 5
Incorrect | $0.18\,\mathrm{A}$
- Response to input 6
Incorrect | The learner may identify a branch that does not actually exist.
- Response to input 7
Incorrect | The identity and connectivity of every component
- Response to input 8
Incorrect | They are arranged one after another in a single loop with one current path.
- Response to input 9
Incorrect | The lamps are generally dimmer because the supply potential difference is shared.
- Response to input 10
Correct | Each parallel lamp receives the full battery potential difference.
- Final response
Incorrect | All lamps on separate parallel branches with a switch in each branch
- Response 12
32% · 17 out of 53 correct · 53 Answered · 17 Correct · 36 Incorrect
| ✓ | Expected: Each answer should be checked against the key, with correct and incorrect responses separated and the total matching those judgments.Found: The product showed right and wrong answers separately, and its 17/53 score matched the question-by-question judgments. |
It is a Pass because the mixed fixed-answer quiz was checked against the key, the product marked right and wrong answers differently, and the final 17/53 score matched those judgments.
Formatting glitch. Several questions render raw LaTeX instead of formatted symbols in the live questions and results table.
Related material shown. Each graded question includes related material quoting the uploaded chapter by filename, showing the input reached the product.
Only eleven judgments are transcribed here; the other 42 appear in the product's results table but are not written out.
Configuration and setup
How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.
How this scenario is graded
How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.
Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.
- Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
- Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
- Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.
Where this sits in the benchmark
This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.
| Level | Name | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | Quiz Generation → | 15 scenarios · 10 tools |
| Capability | Grading → | |
| Scenario | The learner answers some fixed-answer questions correctly and others incorrectly → | |
| Tool | Quizgecko → |
Global scenario definition → · Global capability definition → · Quizgecko product page →
History of this result
What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.
Act on this result
Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.
You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.
Agree →Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.
Disagree →Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.
Report an issue →Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.
Vendor notice →The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.
Verify the proof files
These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.
File fingerprints (SHA-256)
A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.