Does PDF to Quiz give feedback on a wrong answer that shows a misunderstanding?
PDF to Quiz passes this scenario: it gives feedback that addresses a learner's wrong answer when the mistake is a recognizable misunderstanding. The learner said current is used up by bulbs, and the quiz feedback corrected that exact belief; the question card itself shows only the answer and score, with the correction in the results panel.
1 of 1 test case passed
Every test case in this scenario has a result.
The test case
Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above counts this row.
Feedback on a recognizable misunderstandingPassEvidence
“I don't think the current really stays the same all the way round. Each bulb uses up some of the current to make its light, so the current's biggest right next to the battery and gets smaller after every bulb it goes through. That's why the last bulb in the row gets the least current.”
The tool's reply is shown in the evidence under Proof.
Proof 1 · Screen recording · ▶ 0:48–0:54; ▶ 1:45–1:46
| ✓ | Expected: The feedback should explain the mistake, give the correct idea, and address the learner's misunderstanding rather than only revealing the keyed answer.Found: The quiz marked the answer wrong, and the feedback says current is not used up by lamps, gives the correct series-circuit idea, and speaks to that misunderstanding. |
The answer showed a recognizable misunderstanding, and the quiz feedback corrected that exact belief while giving the series-circuit idea. That meets the required feedback behavior; the card placement does not change the result.
Correction panel placement. The question card shows only the reference answer, the learner answer, and the score; the correction appears in the overall feedback panel.
The answer card itself does not show the written feedback; the feedback is on the quiz-wide results panel.
Configuration and setup
How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.
How this scenario is graded
How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.
Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.
- Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
- Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the row says which and quotes the tool.
- Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the row says what's missing.
Where this sits in the benchmark
This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.
| Level | Name | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | Quiz Generation → | 15 scenarios · 10 tools |
| Capability | Answer Feedback → | |
| Scenario | The learner gives a clearly wrong answer → | |
| Tool | PDF to Quiz → |
Global scenario definition → · Global capability definition → · PDF to Quiz product page →
History of this result
What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.
Act on this result
Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.
You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.
Agree →Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.
Disagree →Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.
Report an issue →Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.
Vendor notice →The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.
Verify the proof files
These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.
File fingerprints (SHA-256)
A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.