Can PDF to Quiz create a question that tests a user's stated learning goal?
PDF to Quiz generated a question on the learning goal with enough answer guidance to judge a response. It asks learners to explain lamp failures in series and parallel circuits, and supplies an accurate model answer.
1 of 1 test case passed
Every test case in this scenario has a result.
The test case
Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.
An open-ended question for a stated learning goalPassEvidence
Long Form quiz question Compare the behavior of lamps connected in series and in parallel when one lamp fails. Explain why the failed lamp is easy or difficult to identify in each arrangement, and discuss how current and potential difference account for the difference. Correct Answer for the quiz question In a parallel arrangement, each lamp is on its own branch, so a failure in one branch interrupts current only in that branch. Other branches remain complete, allowing their lamps to continue operating normally.
Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screen recording at 3:24
| ✓ | Expected: Chapter-based explanation of why failed lamps are easy or hard to locate in series versus parallel circuits, with accurate answer guidance covering three parallel-branch points.Found: The answer’s parallel-circuit passage first places each lamp on its own branch and limits current interruption to the failed branch; next, other branches remain complete and their lamps keep working. |
The explanation question and accurate model answer meet the requirement, which does not depend on targeted instructions. Only one of the 50 generated questions, and its answer block, is transcribed here. Generation used uploaded chapter pages and quiz options; the product has no field for typing a learning goal.
Recall and repetition. The question asking learners to define the ampere partly tests recall rather than explanation. A few questions in the 50-question quiz repeat.
Paid plan requirement. Generating long-form questions required the Pro plan.
Configuration and setup
How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.
How this scenario is graded
How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.
Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.
- Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
- Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
- Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.
Where this sits in the benchmark
This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.
| Level | Name | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | Quiz Generation → | 15 scenarios · 10 tools |
| Capability | Quiz Generation → | |
| Scenario | The user asks the quiz to test a particular learning goal → | |
| Tool | PDF to Quiz → |
Global scenario definition → · Global capability definition → · PDF to Quiz product page →
History of this result
What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.
Act on this result
Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.
You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.
Agree →Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.
Disagree →Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.
Report an issue →Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.
Vendor notice →The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.
Verify the proof files
These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.
File fingerprints (SHA-256)
A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.