AI Demos Research — the structured-intelligence platform. Every verdict on these pages opens to the execution behind it.
Graded 17 October 2026

Can PDF to Quiz show a teacher what the class struggled with?

PDF to Quiz did not provide a class report showing what learners struggled with. A completed 47-question attempt scored 11%—5 correct and 42 incorrect—yet the teacher's five analytics panels remained empty after a reload.

1 of 1 test case failed

Every test case in this scenario has a result.

Pass rate0%0 of 1 gradable
Coverage1 of 1test case with a result
0PassNo test case passed.
1FailMissed at least one thing it was expected to do; the reason and proof are with each test case below.
0Not gradableEvery result here could be graded.
0UntestedEvery test case in this scenario has a result.
The pass rate is a summary. The evidence is the test case below: what we sent, what we checked, what the tool returned, and the proof.

The test case

Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.

The class report exposes the shared weaknessFailEvidence
What we sent

We opened the teacher-facing reporting view.

InputDocument (PDF)
Input PDF: the Electric Circuits chapter covering series, parallel, measurement and circuit faults
Open the PDF ↗
What the tool returned

The tool's response has no text to quote: it is what the evidence under Proofs shows.

Proof 1 · Screenshot

Proof 2 · Screenshot

Expected vs. Found
✗Expected: The report should reflect attempts and completions, revealing weaker questions or topics without hiding or reversing differences through overall scores. AI-written diagnosis is not required.Found: The teacher's analytics stayed empty after reload, with no class view, learner list or per-question class breakdown. Progress tracking covers personal practice; the shared weakness remained unobservable.
Supporting proof
Proof 1Screenshot
Screenshot: the teacher's empty performance metrics beside a summary of the source chapter
Open original ↗
Proof 2Screenshot
Screenshot: the teacher's four remaining analytics panels still empty after reload
Open original ↗
Proof 3Screen recording
Screen recording: quiz sharing, the learner's completed attempt and the teacher's empty analytics
Key moments
Open original ↗
Proof 4Screenshot
Screenshot: the teacher copies the quiz's shareable link
Open original ↗
Proof 5Screenshot
Screenshot: the shared quiz's first question, accessible without signing in
Open original ↗
Proof 6Screenshot
Screenshot: the learner's completed attempt scores 11%, with 5 correct and 42 incorrect
Open original ↗
Proof 7Screenshot
Screenshot: the learner's own empty dashboard after the shared-link attempt
Open original ↗
Why this result

A teacher needed a report revealing shared weaknesses. No class-report view was available, even on the highest tier. One learner completed the quiz, so topic ranking was not measured; this is a missing capability, not an access problem, and adding learners would not provide the absent report.

Also observed in this test case

Learner dashboard also empty. The completed shared-link attempt was absent from the learner's own signed-in dashboard, suggesting it was not associated with any account.

Chapter summary, not performance. The AI-generated summary on the teacher's quiz page describes the source chapter, not learners' answers.

Tested by Anshika Gupta · evidence dated 10 October 2026

Configuration and setup

How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.

Software that produced the output
PDF to Quiz
Build or version
Not exposed by the hosted product
Surface
Web app
Set up before the run
The teacher shared a 47-question quiz generated from the Electric Circuits chapter by link; one learner completed it (5 correct, 42 incorrect), and the teacher then opened that quiz's dashboard.
Plan
Pro
Tested
10 October 2026 · Anshika Gupta

How this scenario is graded

How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.

How results are decided

Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.

The rules
  • Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
  • Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
  • Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.

Where this sits in the benchmark

This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.

LevelNameScope
BenchmarkQuiz Generation →15 scenarios · 10 tools
CapabilityClass Reports →
ScenarioThe teacher checks what the class struggled with →
ToolPDF to Quiz →

History of this result

What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.

from the publication record
12 November 2026First publishedQuiz Generation v1

Act on this result

Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.

This matches what I see

You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.

Agree →
This does not match

Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.

Disagree →
Point out an issue

Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.

Report an issue →
Request a retest

On a newer build, a larger dataset, or your own setup.

Request a retest →
We have fixed this

Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.

Vendor notice →
Filed against this evidenceNothing yet. Challenges, counter-evidence and fix notices appear here with their outcome, and stay on the page after they are resolved.
Cite this result
aidemos.com/benchmarks/quiz-generation/results/pdf-to-quiz/class-struggle-report · 0 pass · 1 fail · coverage 1/1 · graded 2026-10-17

The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.

Verify the proof files

These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.

Input · Document (PDF) ↗application/pdf · 265 KB
Proof 1 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 464 KB
Proof 2 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 163 KB
Proof 4 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 157 KB
Proof 5 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 145 KB
Proof 6 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 161 KB
Proof 7 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 142 KB
File fingerprints (SHA-256)

A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.

Input · Document (PDF)220bc6e2dc7e6824ee5bb81ff8f24b17c234c2eb1463835468fdc77a602c3dff
Proof 1 · Screenshota1e72f1ddaaecb0830e0e3401c749b843036cad6acd4c13067176db716fb31ab
Proof 2 · Screenshote7a14c76724689ebbe289960cfdc20bb1f46c73ea61f743cc64fd67af22aac4e
Proof 3 · Screen recording7bb14fb06c54802f02ab7744ea3a5eadd2a6fda32578ed98e8351b79f6cf103d
Proof 4 · Screenshot02a1f33ab97cfdc174e15151189137105f5d5084c7d179a40b4809d0e0959bcb
Proof 5 · Screenshot89e8d2f2cc77df6baf700d65fa565e50f51d4d848aabb1482ddfc848da969836
Proof 6 · Screenshotbcab4d16c7c9149595983057ecfa8f2bd557d8d9064ccec3609a9e295dfd18ed
Proof 7 · Screenshote816615630ba68aaea04e797aecef69a53c98834549798296944186c3bcfb1e8