AI Demos Research — the structured-intelligence platform. Every verdict on these pages opens to the execution behind it.
Graded 7 October 2026

Can PDF to Quiz turn a cleanly scanned document into accurate quiz output?

PDF to Quiz passed this clean-scanned-document scenario. It produced two 14-question quiz runs from the image-only chapter, and the shown review pages include correct keys and explanations. The evidence shows an image-only scan. In the evidence shown, the later circuit questions about battery internal resistance and a voltage-divider expression are keyed correctly and derived from values printed in the chapter. The free plan limited each run to five pages, so the chapter was handled in two runs.

1 of 1 test case passed

Every test case in this scenario has a result.

Pass rate100%1 of 1 gradable
Coverage1 of 1test case with a result
1PassDid everything it was expected to do.
0FailNo test case failed.
0Not gradableEvery result here could be graded.
0UntestedEvery test case in this scenario has a result.
The pass rate is a summary. The evidence is the test case below: what we sent, what we checked, what the tool returned, and the proof.

The test case

Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above counts this row.

Scanned study material with no text layerPassEvidence
What we sent
InputDocument (PDF)
Scanned chapter pages with no text layer.
Open the PDF ↗
What the tool returned

The tool's reply is shown in the screenshots under Proofs.

Expected vs. Found
✓Expected: Valid questions and correct answers from scanned content, without omitting or misreading the study material because it has no text layer.Found: The scan is image-only, and the shown questions and keys match the chapter's numbers and circuit conventions. No omissions or material misreadings are shown.
Supporting proof
Proof 1Screen recording
Screen recording of two 14-question quiz runs.
Key moments
Open original ↗
Proof 2Screenshot
Results page showing the score and first review item.
Open original ↗
Proof 3Screenshot
Question 7 on choosing the ammeter range.
Open original ↗
Proof 4Screenshot
Battery internal resistance question with worked answer.
Open original ↗
Proof 5Screenshot
Three review items on later circuit questions.
Open original ↗
Why this result

The evidence shows an image-only scan, yet the quiz output matches the chapter's numbers and circuit conventions. The shown review pages include correct keys and explanations, and the later chapter questions are keyed correctly from values printed in the chapter.

Also observed on this row

Beyond-chapter questions. Two extra questions use values printed in the chapter, and both are keyed correctly.

Two-run limit. The free plan allows only five pages at a time, so the scan was handled in two runs.

Tested by anshika gupta · evidence dated 5 October 2026

Configuration and setup

How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.

Software that produced the output
PDF to Quiz
Build or version
N/A — no visible version number found anywhere in the recordings (SaaS web app, no exposed version indicator)
Surface
Web app
Set up before the run
A clear scanned PDF whose content is visible as page images rather than selectable text. The product was asked to make a quiz from that material.
Language
English
Difficulty level
Hard
Supplement questions
off
Quiz type
Multiple Choice
Number of questions
14
Tested
5 October 2026 · anshika gupta

How this scenario is graded

How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.

How results are decided

Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.

The rules
  • Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
  • Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the row says which and quotes the tool.
  • Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the row says what's missing.

Where this sits in the benchmark

This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.

LevelNameScope
BenchmarkQuiz Generation →15 scenarios · 10 tools
CapabilityQuiz Generation →
ScenarioA cleanly scanned document →
ToolPDF to Quiz →

History of this result

What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.

from the publication record
14 October 2026First publishedQuiz Generation v1

Act on this result

Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.

This matches what I see

You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.

Agree →
This does not match

Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.

Disagree →
Point out an issue

Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.

Report an issue →
Request a retest

On a newer build, a larger dataset, or your own setup.

Request a retest →
We have fixed this

Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.

Vendor notice →
Filed against this evidenceNothing yet. Challenges, counter-evidence and fix notices appear here with their outcome, and stay on the page after they are resolved.
Cite this result
aidemos.com/benchmarks/quiz-generation/results/pdf-to-quiz/a-cleanly-scanned-document · 1 pass · 0 fail · coverage 1/1 · graded 2026-10-07

The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.

Verify the proof files

These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.

Input · Document (PDF) ↗application/pdf · 3.3 MB
Proof 2 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 262 KB
Proof 3 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 269 KB
Proof 4 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 271 KB
Proof 5 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 458 KB
File fingerprints (SHA-256)

A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.

Input · Document (PDF)409bfc800bb985691ff449b163f30b7a867a879b13f8508369559e7217e3b8db
Proof 1 · Screen recordinga924c8974098015ced0c088347c97442a5db8dfd527ce25eb680f714a4af0704
Proof 2 · Screenshote700c3bdec7cb26de4aba52e27ed5f01da301046b546b44e3be8437375a99233
Proof 3 · Screenshot94729f10ffc4dc99afbda0ce03c481f4f9cd0bb772d9fa8f50ce481aa3e8506d
Proof 4 · Screenshot75fac7e096a1ce0ffa8286cd05a7d110cc008e58e1e9800381d0f31c16a35418
Proof 5 · Screenshotc1eb93b3af23e6a1e9bcee11989a3953187da86c0ef26cd0f722fd81f935fce1