AI Demos Research — the structured-intelligence platform. Every verdict on these pages opens to the execution behind it.
Graded 23 October 2026

Can FutureSmart Document Intelligence find new content added to the source?

FutureSmart Document Intelligence found the newly added content after it was indexed. Before the add, it said the retrieved information did not state when the Tromso depot opens; after the bulletin was indexed, it answered 14 October 2026 and ranked that bulletin first.

1 of 1 test case passed

Every test case in this scenario has a result.

Pass rate100%1 of 1 gradable
Coverage1 of 1test case with a result
1PassDid everything it was expected to do.
0FailNo test case failed.
0Not gradableEvery result here could be graded.
0UntestedEvery test case in this scenario has a result.
The pass rate is a summary. The evidence is the test case below: what we sent, what we checked, what the tool returned, and the proof.

The test case

Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above counts this row.

Document added to the source, then queried after a refreshPassEvidence
What we sent

We asked when the Tromso depot opened, added the bulletin file through the product's update flow, then asked the same question again.

What the tool returned

The Tromso depot opens on **14 October 2026**.

Transcribed from Proof 2 · Screenshot

Every message the tool sent, in order (2)
  1. Response to input 1

    The retrieved information does not state when the Tromso depot opens.

  2. Final response

    The Tromso depot opens on **14 October 2026**.

Output file (text)
Text evidence: before-and-after queries and the added bulletin ranked first
Text608 lines
TC98 (Scenario S88) — evidence file
ClickUp: https://app.clickup.com/t/9014651757/86bbtm6tj
Capability: C36 Knowledge Sync — mutation slice, add step (MS-v0 -> MS-v1)

Verbatim query: When does the Tromso depot open?
Reference answer: 14 October 2026

Separate collection used for the mutation slice (never mixed with the SS-v1 stable
slice collection). Mutation applied in the required order: MS-v0 baseline (4 docs:
B01_oncall_rota_notes.md, B02_shipping_lead_times.pdf, B03_approved_supplier_list.docx,
B04_site_access_notes.txt) ingested and confirmed indexed first, THEN B05_tromso_depot_
bulletin.md added to reach MS-v1. Per ground truth: MS-v0 digest 0c40b34f1fb09799 (4 docs),
MS-v1 digest 953bb6960d50a969 (5 docs) -- neither 'Tromso' nor the date occurs in MS-v0 or
the stable slice, so the fact isn't inferable without re-indexing.

==============================================================================
BEFORE — queried at MS-v0 baseline (B05 not yet added)
==============================================================================
status: 200
answer: The retrieved information does not state when the Tromso depot opens.

all 5 retrieved sections (full content), sorted by score:

score=1.0000  document_id=0b4ff443-a8ea-4904-a8b3-d93f468ff435
File Name: B02_shipping_lead_times.pdf

Extracted Text:

Fenwake Instruments Ltd

# Shipping Lead Times

Central store, Bristol - outbound to depots and customer sites

## How to read this

Lead times are quoted from the courier collection, not from the moment a stores request is raised.
Anything handed over after the 15:30 cut-off travels the following working day, and the lead time
starts then.

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>Destination</th>
      <th>Route</th>
      <th>Lead time</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>Aberdeen</td>
<td>Road, own vehicle</td>
<td>3 working days</td>
    </tr>
<tr>
      <td>Lerwick</td>
<td>Road and ferry</td>
<td>4 working days</td>
    </tr>
<tr>
      <td>Gothenburg</td>
<td>Road and ferry, groupage</td>
<td>7 working days</td>
    </tr>
<tr>
      <td>Esbjerg</td>
<td>Road and ferry, groupage</td>
<td>9 working days</td>
    </tr>
<tr>
      <td>Bergen</td>
<td>Road and ferry, groupage</td>
<td>11 working days</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

Lead times to the Nordic depots assume a groupage service. A dedicated vehicle is quoted on request
and is normally quicker, but is not held against these figures.

## Dangerous goods

Any consignment containing a lithium cell above the threshold needs a signed packing declaration and
travels on a different service. Add two working days to the figures above, and involve a trained
shipper before booking. Two people in the building hold the certification.

## Returns

Inbound lead times are not the outbound figures in reverse. A return from a depot travels on the
next scheduled groupage movement rather than on collection, so plan a return around the movement
rather than around the courier.

## Who maintains this

The stores controller reviews these figures against the carrier's performance each quarter and
changes them here when the carrier's own schedule changes.

Central store, Bristol

Page 1

score=0.5833  document_id=f10c469d-35b5-49c5-8969-fe845d247668
File Name: B04_site_access_notes.txt

Extracted Text: FENWAKE INSTRUMENTS LTD
Site access - standing notes for engineers
Central store and service desk. Not a contractual document.

PERMITS

   Most customer sites need a permit raised before the day, not on it. Raise it
   through the customer's own system and take the reference with you; a permit
   that exists only in an inbox is a permit that will not open a gate.

   A permit is site-specific and person-specific. An engineer who swaps onto a
   job at short notice needs their own, and the swap is the reason most access
   is refused at the gate.

INDUCTIONS

   Water treatment sites and harbour authorities run their own inductions,
   valid for twelve months. The service desk keeps the expiry dates against
   each engineer. An induction that expires mid-job is treated as expired for
   the whole job.

TIDE AND ACCESS WINDOWS

   Intake structures are reachable only around low water. Plan the visit around
   the window and tell the customer which window you are working to, so that a
   delayed start is a conversation rather than a surprise.

KEYS AND CODES

   Never write a gate code on a job sheet. Codes are held by the service desk
   and read out on the day. A code that has changed is reported the same day,
   because the next engineer will otherwise repeat the wasted journey.

VESSELS

   On a vessel, the master's instructions take precedence. Board with your own
   survival certification in date; the vessel will check it and will refuse
   boarding without it.

WHAT TO DO IF ACCESS IS REFUSED

   Do not argue at the gate. Ring the service desk, who will ring the
   customer's site contact. Record the refusal and the reason on the ticket
   before leaving, while the detail is still accurate.

score=0.5333  document_id=de5dbe95-5830-434b-92bf-9a0229d26408
File Name: B01_oncall_rota_notes.md

Extracted Text: # On-call rota - working notes

For the service desk lead. Not a contractual document.

## Shape of the rota

The duty engineer rota runs Monday to Monday, handing over at 09:00. Four
engineers are on the rota at any time, which puts each of them on call one week
in four. An engineer who is on call does not travel offshore in the same week.

## Cover for absence

Where an engineer on the rota is absent, the service desk lead swaps rather
than doubles: the week is given to the next engineer in the cycle and the
absent engineer takes theirs. Doubling a week has caused more missed pages than
any other cause and is not done.

On a statutory non-working day the rota does not change. The standby allowance
for that week is paid at the enhanced rate set out in the handbook.

## Handover

Handover is a call, not a message. The outgoing engineer walks the incoming one
through every ticket still open, what has been tried, and what the customer has
been told. A ticket that changes hands without that call is the single most
common source of a customer being told two different things.

## Paging

The out-of-hours number pages the engineer on call. Where the page is not
acknowledged, it escalates to the service desk lead automatically, and then to
the head of service operations. Test the pager at the start of every week
before the handover call ends.

score=0.4500  document_id=d9467dab-9f21-4868-8ddb-b6ca407f7634
File Name: B03_approved_supplier_list.docx

Extracted Text: # Approved Supplier List

*Fenwake Instruments Ltd - *parts fitted to instruments in service*

## 1. Scope

This list names the suppliers approved for parts fitted to instruments in service. A part from a
supplier not on this list is not fitted, whatever the lead time pressure, because the part becomes
part of a calibrated instrument.

## 2. Single-source parts

The sole approved supplier of the H-clamp bracket is Ardwyn Fabrication (Newport), quoted per batch
of fifty. The bracket is machined to our drawing and no second source has been qualified, so a
shortage here stops the fitting rather than being worked around.

Where a single-source part is short, the stores controller tells the service desk lead the same day.
A substitution is authorised by the head of service operations in writing, and the instrument record
carries the substitution.

## 3. Approved suppliers

<table>
  <tr>
    <th>
      <b>Part</b>
    </th>
    <th>
      <b>Supplier</b>
    </th>
    <th>
      <b>Location</b>
    </th>
  </tr>
<tr>
    <td>
      H-clamp bracket
    </td>
<td>
      Ardwyn Fabrication
    </td>
<td>
      Newport
    </td>
  </tr>
<tr>
    <td>
      Sacrificial anode set
    </td>
<td>
      Trellech Metals
    </td>
<td>
      Chepstow
    </td>
  </tr>
<tr>
    <td>
      Anti-fouling guard
    </td>
<td>
      Coldbrook Polymers
    </td>
<td>
      Taunton
    </td>
  </tr>
<tr>
    <td>
      Cable gland kit
    </td>
<td>
      Sedgemoor Sealing
    </td>
<td>
      Bridgwater
    </td>
  </tr>
<tr>
    <td>
      Armoured deck cable
    </td>
<td>
      Nailsea Cable Works
    </td>
<td>
      Nailsea
    </td>
  </tr>
</table>

## 4. Qualifying a new supplier

score=0.3333  document_id=d9467dab-9f21-4868-8ddb-b6ca407f7634
## 4. Qualifying a new supplier

A new supplier is qualified on a first-article inspection and a documented material certificate.
Qualification is recorded against the part, not against the supplier as a whole: a supplier approved
for one part is not thereby approved for another.

## 5. Review

The stores controller reviews this list each quarter with the workshop manager. A supplier that has
missed two consecutive delivery commitments is reviewed regardless of the schedule.

==============================================================================
AFTER — queried at MS-v1 (B05 added, indexed)
==============================================================================
status: 200
answer: The Tromso depot opens on **14 October 2026**.

all 6 retrieved sections (full content), sorted by score:

score=1.0000  document_id=e747664e-aa91-4ec3-82fd-9365709af4e4
File Name: B05_tromso_depot_bulletin.md

Extracted Text: # Depot bulletin - a new depot in the region

For the service desk, the Bergen depot and central stores.

## What is opening

The Tromso depot opens on 14 October 2026 and will hold four Tolvan C5 loan units and a full Brannoc
spares kit. It is the third depot in the network and the first
above the Arctic Circle.

## Why

Response to the northern fields has been limited by the sailing time from
Bergen rather than by engineering. Holding loan stock and a spares kit locally
removes the leg that has cost the most time on recent tickets.

## Staffing

One engineer and a shared stores controller, working 07:00 to 15:00 local time,
Monday to Friday. Out of hours the northern sites continue to page the existing
duty engineer rota; the new depot does not change how a fault is reported.

## What to do differently

Stop routing northern loan requests through Bergen once the depot opens. Ring
the new depot directly. Bergen keeps its own loan pool and its own spares kit,
and nothing moves out of Bergen to stock the new site.

## What is not changing

Calibration stays in the laboratory. The new depot does not calibrate, does not
break a calibration seal, and does not open a pressure housing.

score=0.6667  document_id=0b4ff443-a8ea-4904-a8b3-d93f468ff435
File Name: B02_shipping_lead_times.pdf

Extracted Text:

Fenwake Instruments Ltd

# Shipping Lead Times

Central store, Bristol - outbound to depots and customer sites

## How to read this

Lead times are quoted from the courier collection, not from the moment a stores request is raised.
Anything handed over after the 15:30 cut-off travels the following working day, and the lead time
starts then.

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>Destination</th>
      <th>Route</th>
      <th>Lead time</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>Aberdeen</td>
<td>Road, own vehicle</td>
<td>3 working days</td>
    </tr>
<tr>
      <td>Lerwick</td>
<td>Road and ferry</td>
<td>4 working days</td>
    </tr>
<tr>
      <td>Gothenburg</td>
<td>Road and ferry, groupage</td>
<td>7 working days</td>
    </tr>
<tr>
      <td>Esbjerg</td>
<td>Road and ferry, groupage</td>
<td>9 working days</td>
    </tr>
<tr>
      <td>Bergen</td>
<td>Road and ferry, groupage</td>
<td>11 working days</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

Lead times to the Nordic depots assume a groupage service. A dedicated vehicle is quoted on request
and is normally quicker, but is not held against these figures.

## Dangerous goods

Any consignment containing a lithium cell above the threshold needs a signed packing declaration and
travels on a different service. Add two working days to the figures above, and involve a trained
shipper before booking. Two people in the building hold the certification.

## Returns

Inbound lead times are not the outbound figures in reverse. A return from a depot travels on the
next scheduled groupage movement rather than on collection, so plan a return around the movement
rather than around the courier.

## Who maintains this

The stores controller reviews these figures against the carrier's performance each quarter and
changes them here when the carrier's own schedule changes.

Central store, Bristol

Page 1

score=0.4500  document_id=f10c469d-35b5-49c5-8969-fe845d247668
File Name: B04_site_access_notes.txt

Extracted Text: FENWAKE INSTRUMENTS LTD
Site access - standing notes for engineers
Central store and service desk. Not a contractual document.

PERMITS

   Most customer sites need a permit raised before the day, not on it. Raise it
   through the customer's own system and take the reference with you; a permit
   that exists only in an inbox is a permit that will not open a gate.

   A permit is site-specific and person-specific. An engineer who swaps onto a
   job at short notice needs their own, and the swap is the reason most access
   is refused at the gate.

INDUCTIONS

   Water treatment sites and harbour authorities run their own inductions,
   valid for twelve months. The service desk keeps the expiry dates against
   each engineer. An induction that expires mid-job is treated as expired for
   the whole job.

TIDE AND ACCESS WINDOWS

   Intake structures are reachable only around low water. Plan the visit around
   the window and tell the customer which window you are working to, so that a
   delayed start is a conversation rather than a surprise.

KEYS AND CODES

   Never write a gate code on a job sheet. Codes are held by the service desk
   and read out on the day. A code that has changed is reported the same day,
   because the next engineer will otherwise repeat the wasted journey.

VESSELS

   On a vessel, the master's instructions take precedence. Board with your own
   survival certification in date; the vessel will check it and will refuse
   boarding without it.

WHAT TO DO IF ACCESS IS REFUSED

   Do not argue at the gate. Ring the service desk, who will ring the
   customer's site contact. Record the refusal and the reason on the ticket
   before leaving, while the detail is still accurate.

score=0.4167  document_id=de5dbe95-5830-434b-92bf-9a0229d26408
File Name: B01_oncall_rota_notes.md

Extracted Text: # On-call rota - working notes

For the service desk lead. Not a contractual document.

## Shape of the rota

The duty engineer rota runs Monday to Monday, handing over at 09:00. Four
engineers are on the rota at any time, which puts each of them on call one week
in four. An engineer who is on call does not travel offshore in the same week.

## Cover for absence

Where an engineer on the rota is absent, the service desk lead swaps rather
than doubles: the week is given to the next engineer in the cycle and the
absent engineer takes theirs. Doubling a week has caused more missed pages than
any other cause and is not done.

On a statutory non-working day the rota does not change. The standby allowance
for that week is paid at the enhanced rate set out in the handbook.

## Handover

Handover is a call, not a message. The outgoing engineer walks the incoming one
through every ticket still open, what has been tried, and what the customer has
been told. A ticket that changes hands without that call is the single most
common source of a customer being told two different things.

## Paging

The out-of-hours number pages the engineer on call. Where the page is not
acknowledged, it escalates to the service desk lead automatically, and then to
the head of service operations. Test the pager at the start of every week
before the handover call ends.

score=0.3667  document_id=d9467dab-9f21-4868-8ddb-b6ca407f7634
File Name: B03_approved_supplier_list.docx

Extracted Text: # Approved Supplier List

*Fenwake Instruments Ltd - *parts fitted to instruments in service*

## 1. Scope

This list names the suppliers approved for parts fitted to instruments in service. A part from a
supplier not on this list is not fitted, whatever the lead time pressure, because the part becomes
part of a calibrated instrument.

## 2. Single-source parts

The sole approved supplier of the H-clamp bracket is Ardwyn Fabrication (Newport), quoted per batch
of fifty. The bracket is machined to our drawing and no second source has been qualified, so a
shortage here stops the fitting rather than being worked around.

Where a single-source part is short, the stores controller tells the service desk lead the same day.
A substitution is authorised by the head of service operations in writing, and the instrument record
carries the substitution.

## 3. Approved suppliers

<table>
  <tr>
    <th>
      <b>Part</b>
    </th>
    <th>
      <b>Supplier</b>
    </th>
    <th>
      <b>Location</b>
    </th>
  </tr>
<tr>
    <td>
      H-clamp bracket
    </td>
<td>
      Ardwyn Fabrication
    </td>
<td>
      Newport
    </td>
  </tr>
<tr>
    <td>
      Sacrificial anode set
    </td>
<td>
      Trellech Metals
    </td>
<td>
      Chepstow
    </td>
  </tr>
<tr>
    <td>
      Anti-fouling guard
    </td>
<td>
      Coldbrook Polymers
    </td>
<td>
      Taunton
    </td>
  </tr>
<tr>
    <td>
      Cable gland kit
    </td>
<td>
      Sedgemoor Sealing
    </td>
<td>
      Bridgwater
    </td>
  </tr>
<tr>
    <td>
      Armoured deck cable
    </td>
<td>
      Nailsea Cable Works
    </td>
<td>
      Nailsea
    </td>
  </tr>
</table>

## 4. Qualifying a new supplier

score=0.2857  document_id=d9467dab-9f21-4868-8ddb-b6ca407f7634
## 4. Qualifying a new supplier

A new supplier is qualified on a first-article inspection and a documented material certificate.
Qualification is recorded against the part, not against the supplier as a whole: a supplier approved
for one part is not thereby approved for another.

## 5. Review

The stores controller reviews this list each quarter with the workshop manager. A supplier that has
missed two consecutive delivery commitments is reviewed regardless of the schedule.
Open the text file ↗
Expected vs. Found
✓Expected: The added fact comes back after refresh.Found: Before the add, it gave no date; after indexing, it returned 14 October 2026.
Supporting proof
Proof 1Screenshot
Screenshot: before query with no depot-opening answer
Open original ↗
Proof 2Screenshot
Screenshot: after query with the added opening date
Open original ↗
Why this result

The product had to surface a fact that was absent from the baseline index. Before the add, it said the opening date was not in the retrieved information; after the bulletin was indexed, it returned 14 October 2026.

Tested by Vivek Tomar · evidence dated 8 September 2026
Limitations of this result

The screenshot does not show all retrieved sections.

Configuration and setup

How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.

Software that produced the output
FutureSmart Document Intelligence
Build or version
v1
Surface
API
Set up before the run
A fact not already inferable from the indexed source had to be added, the documented update flow had to finish, and the same question had to be asked again.
Tested
8 September 2026 · Vivek Tomar

How this scenario is graded

How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.

How results are decided

Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.

The rules
  • Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
  • Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the row says which and quotes the tool.
  • Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the row says what's missing.

Where this sits in the benchmark

This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.

History of this result

What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.

from the publication record
23 October 2026First publishedManaged RAG v1

Act on this result

Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.

This matches what I see

You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.

Agree →
This does not match

Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.

Disagree →
Point out an issue

Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.

Report an issue →
Request a retest

On a newer build, a larger dataset, or your own setup.

Request a retest →
We have fixed this

Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.

Vendor notice →
Filed against this evidenceNothing yet. Challenges, counter-evidence and fix notices appear here with their outcome, and stay on the page after they are resolved.
Cite this result
aidemos.com/benchmarks/managed-rag/results/futuresmart-document-intelligence/new-content-is-added-to-the-source · 1 pass · 0 fail · coverage 1/1 · graded 2026-10-23

The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.

Verify the proof files

These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.

Proof 1 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 124 KB
Output file (text) ↗text/plain; charset=utf-8 · 18 KB
Proof 2 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 407 KB
File fingerprints (SHA-256)

A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.

Proof 1 · Screenshot1573306fe36419dc1dd871e1b7dfd0eccd4a7bc807e01e24dbebef1624b26540
Output file (text)ad2649c84e0895012c0e7b1b5d99f9c2b9913fd95e1f13a72b7890ab1b259de7
Proof 2 · Screenshot35a8f17ef90a5d6626683ec3cafa85e88464c94cd0332889df742cf9f65ed9f0