AI Demos Research — the structured-intelligence platform. Every verdict on these pages opens to the execution behind it.
Graded 23 October 2026

Can FutureSmart Document Intelligence read a cleanly scanned document?

FutureSmart Document Intelligence returned the OCR text from the cleanly scanned document. It returned the as-found bias, -0.037 psu, for certificate C-77413; separately, the scanned certificate was the top search hit.

1 of 1 test case passed

Every test case in this scenario has a result.

Pass rate100%1 of 1 gradable
Coverage1 of 1test case with a result
1PassDid everything it was expected to do.
0FailNo test case failed.
0Not gradableEvery result here could be graded.
0UntestedEvery test case in this scenario has a result.
The pass rate is a summary. The evidence is the test case below: what we sent, what we checked, what the tool returned, and the proof.

The test case

Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above counts this row.

Fact that exists only as pixelsPassEvidence
What we sent

“What as-found bias is recorded on calibration certificate C-77413?”

What the tool returned
Text
The as-found mean bias recorded on calibration certificate C-77413 is **-0.037 psu**.

Text transcript of search and chat responses for the certificate question

Copied from Output file (text), lines 112–113 · an excerpt

Open the whole text file ↗

Source excerpt · partial file · response 1

Text
status: 200
answer: The as-found mean bias recorded on calibration certificate C-77413 is **-0.037 psu**.

Copied from Output file (text), lines 112–113 · an excerpt

Expected vs. Found
✓Expected: The fact should come back from the scanned document, or the tool should say it yielded no text.Found: It returned the as-found bias, -0.037 psu, for certificate C-77413, and the answer did not shift to the as-left -0.004 psu beside it.
Supporting proof
Proof 1Screenshot
Scanned certificate page with the as-found and as-left bias values
Open original ↗
Proof 2Screenshot
Notebook cell sending the question and showing the chat answer
The tool’s response is printed above, under What the tool returned. Show this screenshotOpen original ↗
Why this result

The chat answer gave the as-found bias from the certificate, and the same value appears in the extracted certificate text. That matches the clean-scanned-document task.

Also observed on this row

As-found stayed put. It returned the as-found bias and did not switch to the as-left value beside it.

Certificate text matched. It reproduced the certificate text, including the four-point results table.

Top result was unique. The chat results page showed 27 sections, and only the certificate scored 1.0000.

Tested by Vivek Tomar · evidence dated 8 September 2026
Limitations of this result

Only one scanned page was tested, so the result does not show OCR accuracy in general.

Configuration and setup

How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.

Software that produced the output
FutureSmart Document Intelligence
Build or version
v1
Surface
API
Set up before the run
The document had to be image-only with no hidden text layer, and we ingested it before asking for the fact visible in the image.
Tested
8 September 2026 · Vivek Tomar

How this scenario is graded

How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.

How results are decided

Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.

The rules
  • Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
  • Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the row says which and quotes the tool.
  • Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the row says what's missing.

Where this sits in the benchmark

This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.

LevelNameScope
BenchmarkManaged RAG →15 scenarios · 8 tools
CapabilityData Ingestion →
ScenarioA cleanly scanned document →
ToolFutureSmart Document Intelligence →

History of this result

What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.

from the publication record
23 October 2026First publishedManaged RAG v1

Act on this result

Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.

This matches what I see

You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.

Agree →
This does not match

Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.

Disagree →
Point out an issue

Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.

Report an issue →
Request a retest

On a newer build, a larger dataset, or your own setup.

Request a retest →
We have fixed this

Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.

Vendor notice →
Filed against this evidenceNothing yet. Challenges, counter-evidence and fix notices appear here with their outcome, and stay on the page after they are resolved.
Cite this result
aidemos.com/benchmarks/managed-rag/results/futuresmart-document-intelligence/a-cleanly-scanned-document · 1 pass · 0 fail · coverage 1/1 · graded 2026-10-23

The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.

Verify the proof files

These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.

Proof 1 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 1.8 MB
Proof 2 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 382 KB
Output file (text) ↗text/plain; charset=utf-8 · 8 KB
File fingerprints (SHA-256)

A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.

Proof 1 · Screenshot47dbb5f5045dd0b700bf281cc404d4d7394540e817f0a50ff2355483e5f42406
Proof 2 · Screenshotfb0b57b95a3fa727c84b6fc63ba6ae114bb0911d08083e426213d3c72547d6ee
Output file (text)bc5890f15105eaccde83d6f9160939c50012d492a4865646d423a0403839b8d6