Does Denser AI keep an ordinary text document complete and unchanged?
Denser AI returned the requested fact from the ordinary text document. The 22-month interval came back as the top passage, and the answer repeated the same value; the other returned passages did not state that interval.
1 of 1 test case passed
Every test case in this scenario has a result.
The test case
Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.
Plain prose fact, asked in the document's own wordsPassEvidence
“What is the recommended recalibration interval for the Tolvan A3?”
The recommended recalibration interval for the Tolvan A3 is 22 months from the date of the last certificate. It's worth noting that an instrument returned early due to suspected drift is checked "as found" before any adjustments are made, so the drift can be accurately quantified rather than simply corrected.[1](upload/google_107814369447848734045/chatbots/chatbot_o9ihun9849fcf3tbhigo4/1UQFihWfE26N92LZDfZqY.pdf PassageID:0)
Text log: the query, answer, and all ten passages
Copied from Captured file (text), lines 10–15 · an excerpt
Open the whole text file ↗Source excerpt · partial file · response 1
The recommended recalibration interval for the Tolvan A3 is 22 months from the date of the last certificate. It's worth noting that an instrument returned early due to suspected drift is checked "as found" before any adjustments are made, so the drift can be accurately quantified rather than simply corrected.[1](upload/google_107814369447848734045/chatbots/chatbot_o9ihun9849fcf3tbhigo4/1UQF ihWfE26N92LZDfZqY.pdf PassageID:0)
Copied from Captured file (text), lines 10–14 · an excerpt
| ✓ | Expected: The passage with the fact comes back.Found: The 22-month interval comes back first, and the answer repeats the same value. |
The query had to return the fact from the document. The 22-month interval came back first and the answer repeated it; the other passages did not state that interval.
Other passages. Nine other passages came back below the fact-bearing one, including warranty documents and the employee handbook; none of them states a recalibration interval for the Tolvan A3.
Configuration and setup
How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.
How this scenario is graded
How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.
Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.
- Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
- Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
- Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.
Where this sits in the benchmark
This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.
| Level | Name | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | Managed RAG → | 15 scenarios · 9 tools |
| Capability | Data Ingestion → | |
| Scenario | An ordinary digital text document → | |
| Tool | Denser AI → |
Global scenario definition → · Global capability definition → · Denser AI product page →
History of this result
What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.
Act on this result
Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.
You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.
Agree →Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.
Disagree →Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.
Report an issue →Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.
Vendor notice →The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.
Verify the proof files
These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.
File fingerprints (SHA-256)
A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.