AI Demos Research — the structured-intelligence platform. Every verdict on these pages opens to the execution behind it.
Graded 21 October 2026

Can FutureSmart Database Agent show what people have been asking?

FutureSmart Database Agent shows what people have been asking: its Activity view reports 5 of 5 shown for a split between two people. Three questions come from one account and two from the other, and the query log separately names the account for the net-promoter-score question.

1 of 1 test case passed

Every test case in this scenario has a result.

Pass rate100%1 of 1 gradable
Coverage1 of 1test case with a result
1PassDid everything it was expected to do.
0FailNo test case failed.
0Not gradableEvery result here could be graded.
0UntestedEvery test case in this scenario has a result.
The pass rate is a summary. The evidence is the test case below: what we sent, what we checked, what the tool returned, and the proof.

The test case

Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.

Usage view across two accountsPassEvidence
What we sent

Input 1: “As of September 2, 2026, what's our total revenue in the last 30 days?”

Input 2: “What's our most common payment method?”

Input 3: “How many complaints have we received on social media this month?”

Input 4: “How many customers currently have an active subscription?”

Input 5: “What's our net promoter score for last quarter?”

What the tool returned

Share > Activity > Shared users (5) 5 of 5 shown PERSON | CONVERSATION | QUESTIONS ASKED | LAST ACTIVITY Person 2 (email hidden) | What's our net promoter score for last quarter? | 1 | 5m ago Person 2 (email hidden) | How many customers currently have an active subscription? | 1 | 5m ago Person 1 (email hidden) | How many complaints have we received on social media this month? | 1 | 6m ago Person 1 (email hidden) | What's our most common payment method? | 1 | 7m ago Person 1 (email hidden) | As of September 2, 2026, what's our total revenue in the last 30 days? | 1 | 7m ago CHAT ID 07a447f2-a2c1-4e6d-8948-a4504f137fe3 | SESSION ID bf9b9ecc-9147-40d8-98bc-5b019ff59c09 | TRACE ID 01a0851d-86d3-727b-976a-e1a6b8d031c4 | USER ID Person 2 (email hidden)

Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screenshot

Transcribed from Proof 2 · Screenshot

Every message the tool sent, in order (2)
  1. Final response (message 1 of 2)

    Share > Activity > Shared users (5) 5 of 5 shown PERSON | CONVERSATION | QUESTIONS ASKED | LAST ACTIVITY Person 2 (email hidden) | What's our net promoter score for last quarter? | 1 | 5m ago Person 2 (email hidden) | How many customers currently have an active subscription? | 1 | 5m ago Person 1 (email hidden) | How many complaints have we received on social media this month? | 1 | 6m ago Person 1 (email hidden) | What's our most common payment method? | 1 | 7m ago Person 1 (email hidden) | As of September 2, 2026, what's our total revenue in the last 30 days? | 1 | 7m ago

  2. Final response (message 2 of 2)

    CHAT ID 07a447f2-a2c1-4e6d-8948-a4504f137fe3 | SESSION ID bf9b9ecc-9147-40d8-98bc-5b019ff59c09 | TRACE ID 01a0851d-86d3-727b-976a-e1a6b8d031c4 | USER ID Person 2 (email hidden)

Expected vs. Found
✓Expected: The questions should be visible, tied to the asking account, and counted correctly.Found: Five rows appear, the counter says 5 of 5 shown, and the rows split three to one account and two to the other; the query log names one account again.
Supporting proof
Proof 1Screenshot
Activity screenshot: five questions split across two accounts
Open original ↗
Proof 2Screenshot
Query log screenshot: one question and its account match
Open original ↗
Why this result

It is a pass because the Activity view shows all five questions, counts them as 5 of 5 shown, and ties them to the two accounts that asked them; the query log names one account again.

Also observed in this test case

Log details. The expanded log also shows route, provider, model, key type, latency, and total tokens for that question.

Tested by Ayush Ghosh · evidence dated 9 September 2026
Limitations of this result

The questions are read from the product's own activity list, not from attached chat transcripts.

The activity list uses relative times, so it shows order and spacing but not exact clock times.

Only one query-log row is expanded, so the independent attribution check covers just the net-promoter-score question.

The log time has no time zone label, so it cannot be converted to a zone from the capture alone.

Configuration and setup

How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.

Software that produced the output
FutureSmart Database Agent
Build or version
Not exposed by the hosted product
Model
openai/gpt-oss-120b
Surface
Web app
Set up before the run
The product needs a usage view and two configured accounts, and it is opened after the five questions have already been run.
Provider
groq
Route
pandas
Key type
platform-key
Tested
9 September 2026 · Ayush Ghosh

How this scenario is graded

How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.

How results are decided

Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.

The rules
  • Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
  • Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
  • Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.

Where this sits in the benchmark

This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.

History of this result

What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.

from the publication record
21 October 2026First publishedAI Database Agents v1

Act on this result

Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.

This matches what I see

You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.

Agree →
This does not match

Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.

Disagree →
Point out an issue

Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.

Report an issue →
Request a retest

On a newer build, a larger dataset, or your own setup.

Request a retest →
We have fixed this

Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.

Vendor notice →
Filed against this evidenceNothing yet. Challenges, counter-evidence and fix notices appear here with their outcome, and stay on the page after they are resolved.
Cite this result
aidemos.com/benchmarks/ai-database-agents/results/futuresmart-ai-database-agent/user-question-audit · 1 pass · 0 fail · coverage 1/1 · graded 2026-10-21

The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.

Verify the proof files

These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.

Proof 1 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 54 KB
Proof 2 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 41 KB
File fingerprints (SHA-256)

A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.

Proof 1 · Screenshot7a8a4fc62fd3973c03150946faaf231f5c5159eaf8c09b915e5a2389b8c803dc
Proof 2 · Screenshotb3aa2ad486fb67dbf5667b23bdc0b6453e10f0eab003be4b67bbd84aa8faec99