Does FutureSmart Database Agent assemble several findings into one report?
FutureSmart Database Agent failed to keep the assembled findings consistent. It kept revenue at USD 20,253.47, but the combined report changed the category answer from storage_and_organization to outdoor_and_patio and the cancellation rate from 12.0% to 13.19%.
1 of 1 test case failed
Every test case in this scenario has a result.
The test case
Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.
Three findings assembled into one artifactFailEvidence
Input 1: “As of September 2, 2026, what was our total revenue last month?”
Input 2: “What's our best-selling product category?”
Input 3: “What's our current cancellation rate?”
Input 4: “Put all of that together into one report.”
Response 1 answers Input 1.
Response 2 answers Input 2.
Response 3 answers Input 3.
Response 4, the final response, answers Input 4.
Response 5 is the query the tool generated for Input 4; it is not part of the answer.
September 2 2026 – Consolidated Report — Total Revenue (Last Month): • USD 20,253.47 — Best-Selling Product Category: • outdoor_and_patio — Current Cancellation Rate: • 13.19 % — This snapshot shows that in August 2026 the business generated just over $20k in revenue, with the outdoor_and_patio category leading sales, while 13.19 % of orders placed up to September 2 2026 were cancelled.
Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screen recording at 0:27
Every message the tool sent, in order (5)
- Response to input 1
Total Revenue for August 2026 — As of September 2, 2026, the revenue generated in the previous month (August 2026) was USD 20,253.47. This figure reflects the sum of all order amounts placed between 2026-08-01 and 2026-08-31, excluding any orders that were later refunded.
- Response to input 2
Best-Selling Product Category — Based on the latest sales data, the top-selling product category is storage_and_organization. • Total units sold: 48. This category generated the highest quantity of items sold compared to all other categories in the dataset.
- Response to input 3
Current Cancellation Rate — Our current cancellation rate is 12.0%. This figure represents the proportion of orders that have been marked as cancelled out of the total number of orders in the system.
- Final response
September 2 2026 – Consolidated Report — Total Revenue (Last Month): • USD 20,253.47 — Best-Selling Product Category: • outdoor_and_patio — Current Cancellation Rate: • 13.19 % — This snapshot shows that in August 2026 the business generated just over $20k in revenue, with the outdoor_and_patio category leading sales, while 13.19 % of orders placed up to September 2 2026 were cancelled.
- Generated query for input 4 · not part of the answer
SELECT (SELECT SUM(total_amount) FROM orders WHERE placed_at >= '2026-08-01 00:00:00+00' AND placed_at < '2026-09-01 00:00:00+00' AND refunded_at IS NULL AND currency = 'USD') AS last_month_revenue, (SELECT category::text FROM orders WHERE placed_at < '2026-09-02 00:00:00+00' AND category IS NOT NULL GROUP BY category ORDER BY SUM(total_amount) DESC LIMIT 1) AS best_selling_category, (SELECT ROUND(COUNT(CASE WHEN status = 'cancelled' THEN 1 END)::numeric * 100.0 / COUNT(*), 2) FROM orders WHERE placed_at < '2026-09-02 00:00:00+00') AS cancellation_rate_percentage
| ✗ | Expected: One report that keeps each answer consistent with the same direct question.Found: The combined report kept revenue the same, but changed the category basis and cancellation basis, so two answers no longer matched the direct questions. |
It had to merge the earlier answers without changing them. Revenue stayed the same, but the combined answer recalculated cancellation using only orders before 2 September, giving 13.19% instead of 12.0%, and it also changed the category definition without saying so.
Category basis shift. The category answer switched from units sold to revenue-based ranking, so the combined report no longer matched the earlier category answer.
Revenue unchanged. Revenue stayed at USD 20,253.47 in both answers.
The visible evidence does not show the full third query text.
Configuration and setup
How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.
How this scenario is graded
How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.
Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.
- Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
- Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
- Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.
Where this sits in the benchmark
This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.
| Level | Name | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | AI Database Agents → | 28 scenarios · 11 tools |
| Capability | Reporting → | |
| Scenario | The user wants several findings in one place → | |
| Tool | FutureSmart Database Agent → |
Global scenario definition → · Global capability definition → · FutureSmart Database Agent product page →
History of this result
What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.
Act on this result
Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.
You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.
Agree →Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.
Disagree →Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.
Report an issue →Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.
Vendor notice →The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.
Verify the proof files
These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.
File fingerprints (SHA-256)
A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.