Does FutureSmart Database Agent offer what to ask next?
FutureSmart Database Agent offered two follow-up questions after its August 2026 revenue answer, and both were specific to that answer and answerable from the database. The chips ask about August versus July and the highest-revenue month so far.
1 of 1 test case passed
Every test case in this scenario has a result.
The test case
Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.
Suggested next questions after an answerPassEvidence
“As of September 2, 2026, what was our total revenue last month?”
Total Revenue for August 2026 — As of September 2, 2026, the revenue generated in the previous month (August 2026) was USD 20,253.47. This figure reflects the sum of all order amounts placed between 2026-08-01 and 2026-08-31 that have not been refunded. How did revenue in August 2026 compare with July 2026? Which month had the highest revenue in 2026 so far?
Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screenshot
Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screenshot
Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screenshot
Every message the tool sent, in order (4)
- Final response (message 1 of 3)
Total Revenue for August 2026 — As of September 2, 2026, the revenue generated in the previous month (August 2026) was USD 20,253.47. This figure reflects the sum of all order amounts placed between 2026-08-01 and 2026-08-31 that have not been refunded.
- Generated query · not part of the answer
SELECT currency, SUM(total_amount) AS total_revenue FROM orders WHERE placed_at ≥ '2026-08-01 00:00:00+00' AND placed_at < '2026-09-01 00:00:00+00' AND refunded_at IS NULL GROUP BY currency
- Final response (message 2 of 3)
How did revenue in August 2026 compare with July 2026?
- Final response (message 3 of 3)
Which month had the highest revenue in 2026 so far?
| ✓ | Expected: At least one follow-up question should be answerable from this database and tied to the answer, not generic.Found: Two follow-up chips appear under the answer, and both are answerable from the database and tied to the same analysis. |
It is a pass because the reply shows two follow-up questions after the revenue answer, and both are specific to that answer and answerable from the database.
Cancelled orders counted. The SQL excludes only refunded orders, so cancelled August orders are included in the total.
Earlier attempt context. A prior attempt before the follow-up questions setting was enabled had no chips; it was a different run.
Configuration and setup
How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.
How this scenario is graded
How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.
Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.
- Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
- Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
- Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.
Where this sits in the benchmark
This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.
| Level | Name | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | AI Database Agents → | 28 scenarios · 11 tools |
| Capability | Conversational Interaction → | |
| Scenario | The agent offers what to ask next → | |
| Tool | FutureSmart Database Agent → |
Global scenario definition → · Global capability definition → · FutureSmart Database Agent product page →
History of this result
What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.
Act on this result
Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.
You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.
Agree →Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.
Disagree →Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.
Report an issue →Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.
Vendor notice →The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.
Verify the proof files
These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.
File fingerprints (SHA-256)
A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.