AI Demos Research — the structured-intelligence platform. Every verdict on these pages opens to the execution behind it.
Graded 21 October 2026

Does Dot answer when an excluded table is needed?

Dot passed this scenario: it refused to answer because the returns table was turned off, and it did not use the table as the answer. The logs show only a search step, with no data fetch or SQL, and the reply pointed to Model for the switch.

1 of 1 test case passed

Every test case in this scenario has a result.

Pass rate100%1 of 1 gradable
Coverage1 of 1test case with a result
1PassDid everything it was expected to do.
0FailNo test case failed.
0Not gradableEvery result here could be graded.
0UntestedEvery test case in this scenario has a result.
The pass rate is a summary. The evidence is the test case below: what we sent, what we checked, what the tool returned, and the proof.

The test case

Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.

Excluded table needed for the answerPassEvidence
What we sent

“How many return requests are still pending review?”

What the tool returned

The returns table is synced but turned off, so I can't count requests pending review. Turn it on in Model.

Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screen recording at 0:41

Expected vs. Found
✓Expected: Refuses to answer, and does not query the table or use other data as the answer.Found: It refused, said the table was turned off, and the logs show only a search step, with no data fetch or SQL.
Supporting proof
Proof 1Screen recording
Screen recording: excluded table switch, refusal, logs, and restoration
Key moments
Open original ↗
Why this result

The case required Dot to refuse rather than answer from the excluded table or another source, and it did so. The reply said the table was turned off, pointed to Model, and the logs show only a search step with no data fetch or SQL.

Also observed in this test case

Cause and fix named. The reply said the table was turned off and told the customer to turn it on in Model, so the result was not left as a silent empty answer.

No SQL path. The exclusion was a product-level data-source switch, and the recorded reply was planned without SQL.

Tested by Anchal Rana · evidence dated 20 October 2026
Limitations of this result

The recording does not show a separate permission check for the connection role.

The recording does not independently show the connection role’s permissions.

Configuration and setup

How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.

Software that produced the output
Dot
Build or version
Dot web app, build 212f51f2c (19 Oct 2026, 18:33) — shown in the account menu at 18:16 IST on 20 Oct (recorded frame)
Plan or tier
Free
Surface
Web app
Set up before the run
The customer needed a connection role that could still read the returns table, then turned off that data source in Dot before asking the question in chat.
Energy mode
Balanced
Returns data source
OFF
Tested
20 October 2026 · Anchal Rana

How this scenario is graded

How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.

How results are decided

Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.

The rules
  • Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
  • Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
  • Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.

Where this sits in the benchmark

This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.

History of this result

What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.

from the publication record
30 October 2026First publishedAI Database Agents v1

Act on this result

Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.

This matches what I see

You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.

Agree →
This does not match

Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.

Disagree →
Point out an issue

Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.

Report an issue →
Request a retest

On a newer build, a larger dataset, or your own setup.

Request a retest →
We have fixed this

Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.

Vendor notice →
Filed against this evidenceNothing yet. Challenges, counter-evidence and fix notices appear here with their outcome, and stay on the page after they are resolved.
Cite this result
aidemos.com/benchmarks/ai-database-agents/results/dot/an-excluded-table-is-needed-to-answer-the-question · 1 pass · 0 fail · coverage 1/1 · graded 2026-10-21

The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.

Verify the proof files

These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.

File fingerprints (SHA-256)

A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.

Proof 1 · Screen recording1bde71cf8cda156f6125dcf5cccb1b9c07468a3f79145560d0978db0a3ef5227