Can Basedash find matching records when the user uses a synonym?
Basedash understood the gift-voucher request and returned all 14 matching orders. Their total was USD 16,806.08, the stated reference total, and two were cancelled.
1 of 1 test case passed
Every test case in this scenario has a result.
The test case
Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.
Category asked by the user's synonymPassEvidence
“Show me all orders paid with a gift voucher.”
Found 14 orders paid with a gift voucher, recorded as gift_card. All amounts are in USD; cancelled orders are included.
Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screen recording at 0:14
| ✓ | Expected: Return the 14 matching orders even though the request uses a synonym for the stored payment category.Found: The answer and the stated reference both had 14 orders totalling USD 16,806.08, including two cancelled orders. |
Without synonym hints, Basedash queried the stored gift-card category. The returned orders totalled USD 16,806.08, the reference total, establishing that it retrieved the intended orders rather than treating the unfamiliar wording as an empty result.
Query preview is shorter. The query panel previews 3 of 14 rows; the answer table contains all 14.
Configuration and setup
How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.
How this scenario is graded
How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.
Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.
- Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
- Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
- Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.
Where this sits in the benchmark
This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.
| Level | Name | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | AI Database Agents → | 28 scenarios · 11 tools |
| Capability | Question Answering → | |
| Scenario | The user's wording doesn't match how the values are stored → | |
| Tool | Basedash → |
Global scenario definition → · Global capability definition → · Basedash product page →
History of this result
What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.
Act on this result
Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.
You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.
Agree →Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.
Disagree →Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.
Report an issue →Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.
Vendor notice →The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.
Verify the proof files
These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.
File fingerprints (SHA-256)
A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.