AI Demos Research — the structured-intelligence platform. Every verdict on these pages opens to the execution behind it.
Graded 11 October 2026

Does Kommunicate handle one message with multiple requests?

Kommunicate handled one message with two requests correctly. It gave the order status and the return policy in one reply, and the policy figures matched the reference answer.

1 of 1 test case passed

Every test case in this scenario has a result.

Pass rate100%1 of 1 gradable
Coverage1 of 1test case with a result
1PassDid everything it was expected to do.
0FailNo test case failed.
0Not gradableEvery result here could be graded.
0UntestedEvery test case in this scenario has a result.
The pass rate is a summary. The evidence is the test case below: what we sent, what we checked, what the tool returned, and the proof.

The test case

Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.

Order status plus return policy in one messagePassEvidence
What we sent

“Where is my order 41982, and what is your return policy?”

What the tool returned

Order #41982 is currently "shipped". Tracking number: 1Z999AA10123456784 (UPS). Estimated delivery: Thursday, September 3, 2026. Our return policy: items can be returned within 21 days of delivery (45 days for Cedarline Plus members) for a full refund, minus a 15% restocking fee, unless the item arrived damaged, defective, or wrong.

Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screenshot

Expected vs. Found
✓Expected: Answer both the live order status and the stated return policy.Found: The reply covered both: 41982 was shipped, and the policy listed the return window, member window, and restocking fee.
Supporting proof
Proof 1Screenshot
Screen capture: two requests and one combined reply in preview chat
Open original ↗
Why this result

The message had two requests, and one reply answered both with a shipped status and the stated return policy. That meets the scenario; the capture is limited to the preview interface shown.

Also observed in this test case

Extra policy details. The reply also mentioned a 15% restocking fee and exceptions for damaged, defective, or wrong items.

Tested by Ajay Vekhande · evidence dated 9 September 2026

Configuration and setup

How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.

Software that produced the output
Kommunicate
Build or version
Not exposed by the hosted product
Plan or tier
Enterprise
Surface
Web app
Set up before the run
A shipped order and a return-policy article had to be available; the bot ran in the preview interface.
Tested
9 September 2026 · Ajay Vekhande

How this scenario is graded

How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.

How results are decided

Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.

The rules
  • Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
  • Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
  • Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.

Where this sits in the benchmark

This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.

History of this result

What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.

from the publication record
6 November 2026First publishedAI Customer Support Chatbots v1

Act on this result

Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.

This matches what I see

You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.

Agree →
This does not match

Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.

Disagree →
Point out an issue

Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.

Report an issue →
Request a retest

On a newer build, a larger dataset, or your own setup.

Request a retest →
We have fixed this

Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.

Vendor notice →
Filed against this evidenceNothing yet. Challenges, counter-evidence and fix notices appear here with their outcome, and stay on the page after they are resolved.
Cite this result
aidemos.com/benchmarks/ai-customer-support-chatbots/results/kommunicate/one-message-contains-multiple-requests · 1 pass · 0 fail · coverage 1/1 · graded 2026-10-11

The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.

Verify the proof files

These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.

Proof 1 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 33 KB
File fingerprints (SHA-256)

A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.

Proof 1 · Screenshotbebb21ba265d3c2e0d215bdbbb671fd8aacfa63f642694ee1d6b99933df71383