Business & Marketing

Chatbase

A reliable knowledge-base website chatbot for straightforward policy Q&A, but the 50-credit free plan blocks deeper RAG testing.

Visit Chatbase

Accurate policy retrievalStrong follow-ups50-credit free planComplex multi-hop blocked

Strong on practical FAQ retrieval, limited on full benchmark depth

Chatbase answered the tested return-policy, refund, and international-return questions accurately and kept context across follow-ups, so it looks credible for lightweight website knowledge-base chatbots. The limitation is evaluation depth: the report hit the free plan’s 50-credit cap before the hardest complex multi-hop RAG test, so this research supports straightforward policy deployments more than broad claims about deeper production reasoning.

Hands-on Chatbase walkthrough recorded during the knowledge-base chatbot test.

In-Depth Review

Our detailed analysis of Chatbase — features, performance, and real-world testing.

AI Demos Team

Expert Reviewer

Verified Review

Feature-by-Feature Breakdown

Knowledge-grounded answer retrieval

Reliable on direct lookup from policy documents.

▾

Test Summary

Feature tested: Knowledge-grounded answer retrieval

Result: Passed — Reliable on direct lookup from policy documents.

Chatbase answered direct questions from the uploaded NovaTech policy files, including electronics return windows, refund timelines by payment method, and whether international returns are allowed.

INPUT

What is your return window for electronics?

↓→

image

Output artifact for "Knowledge-grounded answer retrieval" test: For the electronics return-window question, Chatbase answered that standard customers can return eligible electronics within 30 calendar days of confirmed deliv, chatbase-input1-return-window-step1-ingestion-1.png

For the electronics return-window question, Chatbase answered that standard customers can return eligible electronics within 30 calendar days of confirmed delivery and that Premium members get 45 days. It also added the condition that the item must be in original condition with accessories and packaging included. The report noted one omission: this initial answer did not name the specific non-returnable product categories.

INPUT

How long do refunds take?

↓→

Image

INPUT

Can I return products internationally?

↓→

image

Output artifact for "Knowledge-grounded answer retrieval" test: For international returns, Chatbase said returns are possible in some cases and correctly listed the limiting conditions, customer-paid responsibilities, non-re, chatbase-chatbase-international-returns-answer-light-theme.png

For international returns, Chatbase said returns are possible in some cases and correctly listed the limiting conditions, customer-paid responsibilities, non-reimbursed costs, and restricted categories such as lithium batteries, hazardous materials, and region-locked wireless modules. The answer was detailed and grounded, but it did not state a return-initiation time window or identify which countries are supported.

Bottom Line

On straightforward knowledge-base lookup, Chatbase retrieved policy details accurately and returned clean, structured answers, though some useful edge-case details were left unstated.

Context-aware follow-up answering

Strong short-thread memory and follow-up handling.

▾

Test Summary

Feature tested: Context-aware follow-up answering

Result: Passed — Strong short-thread memory and follow-up handling.

Feature tested: Context-aware follow-up answering

Result: Passed

Verdict: Strong short-thread memory and follow-up handling.

Expected behavior: Chatbase maintained conversational context across follow-up questions on the same policy topic, expanding the answer instead of resetting to a generic response.

Test case: Text prompt → Image

Input type: Text prompt

Input used: Input artifact (Text prompt): Follow-up sequence

Observed output: Output artifact (Image): After the return-window question, Chatbase correctly handled the follow-up and confirmed that opened electronics can still be returned if physically undamaged w — chatbase-input1-return-window-step3-followup-response.png

Input artifact: Input artifact (Text prompt): Follow-up sequence

Output artifact: Output artifact (Image): After the return-window question, Chatbase correctly handled the follow-up and confirmed that opened electronics can still be returned if physically undamaged w — chatbase-input1-return-window-step3-followup-response.png

What changed: Text prompt transformed into Image

Test case: Text prompt → Image

Input type: Text prompt

Input used: Input artifact (Text prompt): Follow-up sequence

Observed output: Output artifact (Image): After the refund-timeline question, Chatbase correctly interpreted the COD follow-up and explained that cash-on-delivery refunds are not issued in cash or to th — chatbase-cod-refund-bank-transfer-or-upi.png

Input artifact: Input artifact (Text prompt): Follow-up sequence

Output artifact: Output artifact (Image): After the refund-timeline question, Chatbase correctly interpreted the COD follow-up and explained that cash-on-delivery refunds are not issued in cash or to th — chatbase-cod-refund-bank-transfer-or-upi.png

What changed: Text prompt transformed into Image

Test case: Text prompt → Image

Input type: Text prompt

Input used: Input artifact (Text prompt): Follow-up sequence

Observed output: Output artifact (Image): After the international-returns question, Chatbase kept the topic context and answered that customs duties, import taxes, brokerage fees, and local handling cha — chatbase-chatbase-customs-fees-answer-light-theme.png

Input artifact: Input artifact (Text prompt): Follow-up sequence

Output artifact: Output artifact (Image): After the international-returns question, Chatbase kept the topic context and answered that customs duties, import taxes, brokerage fees, and local handling cha — chatbase-chatbase-customs-fees-answer-light-theme.png

What changed: Text prompt transformed into Image

Why it matters / Conclusion: Short-thread context retention was strong across all tested follow-ups, especially when the follow-up asked for exceptions, payment-method nuance, or the scope of Premium benefits.

Chatbase maintained conversational context across follow-up questions on the same policy topic, expanding the answer instead of resetting to a generic response.

INPUT

Can opened electronics still be returned?

↓→

Image

Output artifact for "Context-aware follow-up answering" test: After the return-window question, Chatbase correctly handled the follow-up and confirmed that opened electronics can still be returned if physically undamaged w, chatbase-input1-return-window-step3-followup-response.png

After the return-window question, Chatbase correctly handled the follow-up and confirmed that opened electronics can still be returned if physically undamaged with all original packaging and accessories included. The chatbot carried forward the conversation context instead of resetting to a generic response.

INPUT

How are COD refunds processed and are they issued to the original payment method?

↓→

image

Output artifact for "Context-aware follow-up answering" test: After the refund-timeline question, Chatbase correctly interpreted the COD follow-up and explained that cash-on-delivery refunds are not issued in cash or to th, chatbase-cod-refund-bank-transfer-or-upi.png

After the refund-timeline question, Chatbase correctly interpreted the COD follow-up and explained that cash-on-delivery refunds are not issued in cash or to the original payment method. It said COD refunds are processed only by verified bank transfer or UPI after bank details, beneficiary confirmation, and identity validation. The report noted that the answer did not say how long the verification step itself takes.

INPUT

Who pays customs fees and do Premium members get free international returns?

↓→

image

Output artifact for "Context-aware follow-up answering" test: After the international-returns question, Chatbase kept the topic context and answered that customs duties, import taxes, brokerage fees, and local handling cha, chatbase-chatbase-customs-fees-answer-light-theme.png

After the international-returns question, Chatbase kept the topic context and answered that customs duties, import taxes, brokerage fees, and local handling charges are paid by the international customer. It also clearly separated Premium domestic benefits from international returns, stating that Premium benefits apply to eligible domestic returns only and do not include free international returns. The answer was strong, though it still did not identify which countries support international returns.

Bottom Line

Short-thread context retention was strong across all tested follow-ups, especially when the follow-up asked for exceptions, payment-method nuance, or the scope of Premium benefits.

Emotional tone handling & safe response

Handled frustration empathetically and redirected to policy without escalating.

▾

Test Summary

Feature tested: Emotional tone handling & safe response

Result: Passed — Handled frustration empathetically and redirected to policy without escalating.

When a user expressed frustration with a violent statement ("feel like breaking my PC"), Chatbase de-escalated calmly, acknowledged the emotion, and still delivered the correct policy steps — reporting a wrong item within 72 hours with required documentation.

text

I am so frustrated! This is the 3rd time my order has been wrong. I feel like breaking my PC right now!

↓→

image

Output artifact for "Emotional tone handling & safe response" test: Chatbase acknowledged the frustration, declined to assist with anything harmful, and correctly guided the user to report the wrong item within 72 hours with ord, chatbase-input4-frustration-step1-response.png

Chatbase acknowledged the frustration, declined to assist with anything harmful, and correctly guided the user to report the wrong item within 72 hours with order confirmation, item photos, shipping label, and serial number if applicable.

Bottom Line

Chatbase balanced emotional sensitivity with accurate policy delivery — it didn't ignore the frustration or skip the policy steps.

Plan detail observed during testing

The report only documented the free-plan limit, not paid pricing.

TESTED

Free plan

50 credits total

50 message credits/month, 1 AI agent, 400 KB training data, 1 workspace member. Inactive agents deleted after 14 days — effectively a trial, not a permanent free tier.

Hobby

$40/mo (or $32/mo billed annually)

For solo users and small businesses. 10 MB training data, more credits than Free. Good for a single chatbot with moderate traffic.

Standard

$150/mo (or $120/mo billed annually)

20 MB training data, 2 AI agents. Watch out — add-ons like branding removal ($199/mo), custom domain ($59/mo) can push real cost much higher. Credit model means premium AI models (like Claude Opus) burn 5x more credits.

Pro

$500/mo (or $400/mo billed annually)

40 MB training data, higher credit limits. Best for teams regularly hitting overage on Standard. Annual billing saves ~20%.

Enterprise

Custom pricing

Includes SSO, audit logs, white-labeling, custom roles, dedicated CSM, SLAs, priority support. Contact sales for quote.

Pricing verified June 2026. Real costs often higher due to credit model and add-ons. We re-check quarterly.

Is This Right For You?

A side-by-side guide based on our hands-on testing.

✓ Use This If

●You need a lightweight website chatbot that can answer straightforward policy or FAQ questions from uploaded documents accurately.

●You want short follow-up threads to stay on topic without manually restating the context.

●Your knowledge base looks more like clear support or policy documentation than deep multi-hop reasoning across many sources.

✕ Skip This If

●You need to fully benchmark or run serious RAG testing on the free plan; the 50-credit cap stopped complete evaluation here.

●Your use case depends on proven complex multi-document, multi-hop reasoning, because the hardest query could not be tested in this report.

●You need a documented review of citation quality or source attribution behavior, which this report does not provide.

Business & MarketingCustomer Support Chatbotstext

It was accurate on the direct questions that were completed. Chatbase returned the correct 30-day electronics return window for standard customers, the 45-day window for Premium members, the tested refund timelines for each payment method, and the core rules around international returns, customer-paid fees, and restricted product categories.

Yes. In the tested threads, Chatbase preserved context well. After the initial return-window question, it correctly answered the opened-electronics follow-up with conditions, exclusions, and the possible 20% restocking fee. After the refund-timeline question, it correctly handled the COD refund follow-up. After the international-returns question, it correctly clarified customs responsibility and that Premium benefits do not include free international returns.

The omissions were mostly edge-case details rather than outright wrong answers. The initial return-window answer did not list specific non-returnable product categories. The refund answer did not explain what to do if a refund is delayed, and the COD follow-up did not say how long bank-detail verification takes. The international-returns answer did not state the time window to initiate a return or which countries are supported.

No. The report says the free plan was capped at 50 credits total, and that hard limit prevented completion of the most critical complex multi-hop query that would have tested reasoning across multiple policy documents at once.

Based on this test, it looks suitable for lightweight single-policy or straightforward FAQ-style deployments because its direct retrieval and follow-up handling were reliable. The research does not establish how well it performs on deeper, more demanding RAG workloads because testing stopped at the free-plan credit cap.

No. Citations and source attribution were part of the broader use-case criteria, but this specific Chatbase report does not document how citations appeared or how trustworthy they were.