The generated audio lacked depth and was not convincing on close inspection, even though it added plausible ambient bird sounds.

⚠ Struggled🧾 artifact-verifiedinput + output shownTest date not recordedFlexClip
What was measured
Output Quality

The generated audio sounds clean, professional, and usable without further editing.

decisive for this rankingtransformation

Clean, professional audio is part of the actual deliverable, not just a nice extra. (3 of 3 judges)

What was given, what came back

Test input: Bird/Nature Video · video · group: auto-sfx-video-generation
Input — what we sent
Input not captured
This run recorded no prompt or input file for the test, so we cannot show you what produced the result below. Capture gaps are tracked, not hidden.

A video featuring a bird in frame, used to test whether generated chirping or ambient sounds sync to the specific animal and movement shown on screen.

Why this input is hard
  • · sync accuracy to a visible subject
  • · nature/animal sound matching
  • · avoiding generic ambience that ignores timing
  • · scene-specific audio generation
Provenance
Observation
7691deec-7e6d-4a0b-8a18-a08baa571de5
Evidence run
90451942-9055-4e8c-85e6-17c773437ed7
Study
Automatically Add Relevant Sound Effects to Videos
Research task
86b84w3x5
Tested at
not recorded
Source
first-party
Evidence state
verified
Proof shown
input + output shown
Cost / latency
not captured
Repeat run
not captured
Tester
not captured

The last three rows are honest blanks, not placeholders — our capture has no field for them yet.

Query this
get_evidence({
  tool: "flexclip",
  scenario: "auto-sfx-video-generation"
})
MCP · mcp.aidemos.com/api/mcp
Free with attribution.
Same input, same check — 0 other tools
measured on Output Quality

No other tool was measured on this criterion for this input.

Real inputs and real outputs, no retouching · every cell queryable via API & MCP · aidemos.com