AI Demos Research — the structured-intelligence platform. Every verdict on these pages opens to the execution behind it.
Graded 26 October 2026

Can FutureSmart Document Intelligence derive a value that appears nowhere but follows from other values?

FutureSmart Document Intelligence derived the missing fuel cost for this invoice. The invoice shows 450 miles and £0.18 per mile, and the product returned 81 in both the JSON output and the overview card.

1 of 1 test case passed

Every test case in this scenario has a result.

Pass rate100%1 of 1 gradable
Coverage1 of 1test case with a result
1PassDid everything it was expected to do.
0FailNo test case failed.
0Not gradableEvery result here could be graded.
0UntestedEvery test case in this scenario has a result.
The pass rate is a summary. The evidence is the test case below: what we sent, what we checked, what the tool returned, and the proof.

The test case

Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above counts this row.

Derived value from two present valuesPassEvidence
What we sent
InputDocument (PDF)
Freight invoice showing the two values
Open the PDF ↗
What the tool returned
JSON
{
  "summary": "This invoice from Calderwood Freight Services details the freight and handling charges for a shipment from Leeds to Portsmouth. The consignment was successfully delivered and signed for on 07 March 2026 with no reported damage or exceptions.",
  "document_type": "invoice",
  "distance_miles": 450,
  "total_fuel_cost": 81,
  "currency": "GBP",
  "fuel_rate__per_mile": 0.18,
  "file_name": "Calderwood_Freight_S66_S67_S72.pdf"
}

Output JSON with the derived fuel cost

Copied from Output file (JSON), lines 1–9

Open the JSON file ↗
Expected vs. Found
✓Expected: The computed value, not an operand or an invented number.Found: It returned 81 as the derived value, with 450 and 0.18 echoed separately.
Supporting proof
Proof 1Screenshot
Overview card repeating the extracted values
The tool’s response is printed above, under What the tool returned. Show this screenshotOpen original ↗
Why this result

The case required a value computed from two present inputs. The invoice shows both inputs once and no 81, and the product returned 81, so it met the requirement rather than returning an operand or a made-up value.

Also observed on this row

Rate now stays decimal. The fuel-rate value now appears as 0.18 instead of 0.

Output key spelling. The output uses a double-underscore spelling for the fuel-rate field.

Tested by Rugved Nichite · evidence dated 18 September 2026

Configuration and setup

How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.

Software that produced the output
FutureSmart Document Intelligence
Build or version
Not exposed by the hosted product
Surface
Web app
Set up before the run
The run used seven fields: distance miles, fuel rate per mile, total fuel cost, currency, summary, document type, and file name; only distance miles had no definition supplied.
Schema fields
7 fields
Total fuel cost definition
The total fuel cost — calculated as the distance in miles multiplied by the fuel rate per mile. This value does NOT appear anywhere in the document; you must compute it from distance_miles × fuel_rate_per_mile.
Fuel rate definition
The fuel rate per mile, labelled 'FUEL RATE' on the document, including currency. The value may be a whole number or a decimal number — if the number in the document is in decimal form, the extraction should give the value in decimal, exactly as mentioned in the document.
Distance miles definition
no definition
Schema configuration
User-defined schema with total_fuel_cost defined as distance_miles × fuel_rate_per_mile
Tested
18 September 2026 · Rugved Nichite

How this scenario is graded

How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.

How results are decided

Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.

The rules
  • Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
  • Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the row says which and quotes the tool.
  • Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the row says what's missing.

Where this sits in the benchmark

This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.

History of this result

What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.

from the publication record
6 October 2026First publishedStructured Document Extraction v1
21 October 2026Taken down
The page left the site; nothing was deleted.
26 October 2026Republished
27 October 2026Updated — the page was revised
The result is unchanged: 1 pass · 0 fail. The earlier result stays readable. Read the earlier result →

Act on this result

Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.

This matches what I see

You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.

Agree →
This does not match

Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.

Disagree →
Point out an issue

Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.

Report an issue →
Request a retest

On a newer build, a larger dataset, or your own setup.

Request a retest →
We have fixed this

Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.

Vendor notice →
Filed against this evidenceNothing yet. Challenges, counter-evidence and fix notices appear here with their outcome, and stay on the page after they are resolved.
Cite this result
aidemos.com/benchmarks/structured-document-extraction/results/futuresmart-document-intelligence/the-value-must-be-derived · 1 pass · 0 fail · coverage 1/1 · graded 2026-10-26

The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.

Verify the proof files

These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.

Input · Document (PDF) ↗application/pdf · 118 KB
Output file (JSON) ↗application/json · 0 KB
Proof 1 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 78 KB
File fingerprints (SHA-256)

A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.

Input · Document (PDF)1bcc6c7b945956c5b6f5a87d223ed3d578a62aa2c56c5fc1e3abedb4cc4de72e
Output file (JSON)e5e0676a802fb4afc4e14802492712e88c8db87ea228dbaad84a262d0cc554ef
Proof 1 · Screenshot6f422030d0f5d657db29b13f1cfc870fad3914b648d8e7da58888c848d0c3e5c