AI Demos Research — the structured-intelligence platform. Every verdict on these pages opens to the execution behind it.
Graded 23 October 2026

Does FutureSmart Document Intelligence keep corrected data downstream?

FutureSmart Document Intelligence did not keep corrected data downstream. The export path existed, but it carried only the original extraction, and the receipt row in the downloaded CSV still held RHS-70234.

1 of 1 test case failed

Every test case in this scenario has a result.

Pass rate0%0 of 1 gradable
Coverage1 of 1test case with a result
0PassNo test case passed.
1FailMissed at least one thing it was expected to do; the reason and proof are on the row.
0Not gradableEvery result here could be graded.
0UntestedEvery test case in this scenario has a result.
The pass rate is a summary. The evidence is the test case below: what we sent, what we checked, what the tool returned, and the proof.

The test case

Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above counts this row.

Correction survives the delivery pathFailEvidence
What we sent
Input 1Document (PDF)
Receipt: Riverside Home Services with receipt number
Open the PDF ↗
Input 2Document (PDF)
Receipt: Sunrise Plumbing & Drain copy
Open the PDF ↗
Input 3Document (PDF)
Receipt: GreenLeaf Appliance Repair copy
Open the PDF ↗
Input 4Document (PDF)
Invoice: Meridian Retail Group lookalike
Open the PDF ↗
Input 5Document (PDF)
Freight invoice: Calderwood Freight, three pages
Open the PDF ↗
Input 6Document (PDF)
Invoice and delivery note: Harrowgate goods supplied
Open the PDF ↗
Input 7Document (PDF)
Scanned twin: Thistlewood PlantHire without text
Open the PDF ↗
Input 8Document (PDF)
Invoice: Thistlewood Plant & Tool Hire
Open the PDF ↗
Input 9Document (PDF)
Two-page invoice: Meridian Retail Group totals
Open the PDF ↗
What the tool returned
CSV5 rows · 46 columns
Object IdDocument TypeSummaryPage NumberSubtotalBilled ToCurrencyDamage ExceptionsDistance MilesDocument OutlineEntitiesFile NameFuel Rate Per MileHire PeriodIdentifier NumberInvoice NumberInvoice ReferenceKeywordsLine Items 0 AmountLine Items 0 DescriptionLine Items 0 Line TotalLine Items 0 QuantityLine Items 0 Unit PriceLine Items 1 AmountLine Items 1 DescriptionLine Items 1 Line TotalLine Items 1 QuantityLine Items 1 Unit PriceLine Items Remaining AmountLine Items Remaining DescriptionLine Items Remaining Line TotalLine Items Remaining QuantityLine Items Remaining Unit PriceOrder ReferenceOrganizationsReceipt NumberReceived ByReference NumberSiteTaxTemporal ContextTitleTopicsTotal DueTotal Fuel CostVehicle Registration
4daa8753-c6f9-49a9-bfaf-03c9be8656edinvoiceThis invoice from Thistlewood Plant & Tool Hire to Oakbridge Construction Ltd covers the weekly hire of site equipment including a telehandler, generators, and site fencing. The total amount due for the period of 03 March to 10 March 2026 is £1,754.40.1462Oakbridge Construction LtdGBPHeader with vendor and client details, hire period, line items table, subtotal, tax, total due, and remittance instructions.Thistlewood Plant & Tool Hire; Oakbridge Construction LtdSiblingA1_Thistlewood_PlantHire.pdf03 Mar - 10 Mar 2026TPH-3301Telehandler; Generator; Site fencingTelehandler, 4-tonne, weekly hire, 1 unit at 850.00 each, total 850.00Generator, 20kVA, weekly hire, 2 units at 210.00 each, total 420.00Site fencing, per 10m panel, weekly, 8 units at 24.00 each, total 192.00Thistlewood Plant & Tool Hire; Oakbridge Construction LtdOakbridge Depot Extension292.403 Mar - 10 Mar 2026Invoice TPH-3301plant hire; construction equipment1754.4
75285524-15d3-4d21-9000-cf4c1bc8e326invoiceThis invoice from Meridian Retail Group to Blackwood Distribution LLC details the supply of various retail fixtures and store equipment. The document lists ten line items including shelving, checkout counters, and scanning equipment, totaling £6,591.24 including VAT.main_invoice_multipage_blackwood.pdf1008Retail Shelving Unit - Steel, 5-Tier1284930Checkout Counter - Laminate Top3310273; 648; 304; 1080; 580; 330; 570; 380Security Tag Deactivator - Handheld; Price Label Printer - Thermal; Shopping Basket - 20L, Set of 10; Storeroom Pallet Racking - 4-Bay; Barcode Scanner - Wireless; Receipt Paper Roll - Case of 50; Mannequin - Adjustable, Full Body; Display Signage Kit - Window Set6; 4; 8; 2; 10; 15; 6; 545.5; 162; 38; 540; 58; 22; 95; 76
cbb19486-9090-445b-a340-e940905e9bb1receiptThis document is a service receipt from Riverside Home Services for a boiler annual inspection performed for Mr. Grant Sullivan. It details the service provided, the subtotal, the applied tax, and the final total amount due.85USDTC1_TC4_TC5A_baseline_receipt_1.pdfRHS-70234$5.1090.1
dd1200e5-4695-4d43-84a5-9077b688d3e7invoiceThis invoice from Calderwood Freight Services details the road haulage charges for a consignment transported from Leeds to Portsmouth. The document confirms the successful delivery of goods on March 7, 2026, with no reported damages or exceptions.GBP450Calderwood_Freight_S66_S67_S72.pdf081
45a86024-1893-4ef0-b83e-b65858eebb1dinvoiceThis document is an invoice issued by Meridian Retail Group to Blackwood Distribution LLC for the supply of various retail fixtures and store equipment. It details ten line items, including shelving, checkout counters, and scanning equipment, with a total amount due of £6,591.24.2£6,103.00main_invoice_multipage_blackwood.pdf

CSV export: 17 collection rows

Copied from Output file (CSV), lines 1–6 · an excerpt

Open the whole CSV file ↗
Expected vs. Found
✗Expected: The delivery path carries the corrected value.Found: The export exists, but it carries the original extraction rather than a corrected value.
Supporting proof
Proof 1Screenshot
Downloads listing for the exported CSV
Open original ↗
Proof 2Screenshot
Opened CSV with receipt row highlighted
The tool’s response is printed above, under What the tool returned. Show this screenshotOpen original ↗
Proof 3Screenshot
Structured data tab after export
The tool’s response is printed above, under What the tool returned. Show this screenshotOpen original ↗
Why this result

The export path exists, but the product cannot change a value before exporting it, so the downstream copy still shows the original extraction. That makes this a Fail rather than a pass.

Also observed on this row

Export wrote file. The Export CSV action wrote a CSV file, and the receipt value appears in the exported receipt row.

Rows per document. The export is collection-level: it produced one row per document across 17 documents and nine source PDFs.

Schema flattening. The CSV had 46 columns, matching the 32-column schema after the line-items group was flattened.

Second path exists. The product also documents an API delivery path.

Tested by Rugved Nichite · evidence dated 19 September 2026
Limitations of this result

The export covers the whole collection and does not show a corrected value or edit history.

The toast alone does not show a file on disk; the Downloads view and opened CSV do, and no edit, correction, or re-export control is shown.

Configuration and setup

How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.

Software that produced the output
FutureSmart Document Intelligence
Build or version
Not exposed by the hosted product
Surface
Web app
Set up before the run
The collection’s 17 documents were already extracted earlier, and the same collection was read back through Export CSV; no corrected value was in place because the product offers no way to change one.
Tested
19 September 2026 · Rugved Nichite

How this scenario is graded

How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.

How results are decided

Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.

The rules
  • Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
  • Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the row says which and quotes the tool.
  • Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the row says what's missing.

Where this sits in the benchmark

This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.

History of this result

What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.

from the publication record
23 October 2026First publishedStructured Document Extraction v1
27 October 2026Updated — the page was revised
The result is unchanged: 0 pass · 1 fail. The earlier result stays readable. Read the earlier result →

Act on this result

Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.

This matches what I see

You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.

Agree →
This does not match

Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.

Disagree →
Point out an issue

Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.

Report an issue →
Request a retest

On a newer build, a larger dataset, or your own setup.

Request a retest →
We have fixed this

Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.

Vendor notice →
Filed against this evidenceNothing yet. Challenges, counter-evidence and fix notices appear here with their outcome, and stay on the page after they are resolved.
Cite this result
aidemos.com/benchmarks/structured-document-extraction/results/futuresmart-document-intelligence/corrected-data-goes-downstream · 0 pass · 1 fail · coverage 1/1 · graded 2026-10-23

The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.

Verify the proof files

These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.

Input 1 · Document (PDF) ↗application/pdf · 54 KB
Input 2 · Document (PDF) ↗application/pdf · 7 KB
Input 3 · Document (PDF) ↗application/pdf · 8 KB
Input 4 · Document (PDF) ↗application/pdf · 55 KB
Input 5 · Document (PDF) ↗application/pdf · 118 KB
Input 6 · Document (PDF) ↗application/pdf · 176 KB
Input 7 · Document (PDF) ↗application/pdf · 232 KB
Input 8 · Document (PDF) ↗application/pdf · 78 KB
Input 9 · Document (PDF) ↗application/pdf · 82 KB
Output file (CSV) ↗text/csv; charset=utf-8 · 10 KB
Proof 1 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 27 KB
Proof 2 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 212 KB
Proof 3 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 155 KB
File fingerprints (SHA-256)

A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.

Input 1 · Document (PDF)a96bbe1c5b22336e7b54169baf72b85e45eabf1312cd293a1821017b52fa85f7
Input 2 · Document (PDF)0276d246d69482340b53797f4eaa21831977cede22c8c8f14fc48dbf84757660
Input 3 · Document (PDF)4a0b1754da9f52ce35a783d58f8e8a1b5e1353b5b992d5553122886f1cd4a638
Input 4 · Document (PDF)791590c9d422110ebebf3c1e434eebac20aff3c6728024693becc870818c26d8
Input 5 · Document (PDF)1bcc6c7b945956c5b6f5a87d223ed3d578a62aa2c56c5fc1e3abedb4cc4de72e
Input 6 · Document (PDF)89fb14d7c0897bbfef47ffa3aa3930ee7eccf62c8a9430710d1906598c9bdfec
Input 7 · Document (PDF)6f1cc2a5f5e5e57494671341557d7a53d318b0f62bb8f8536165e1dac1b7a805
Input 8 · Document (PDF)fdcf03ac5ee53b083da58166f17fd41e7c72de79a9f3a3f6b67daa1360ddbca9
Input 9 · Document (PDF)d1f3282702260730267278b1071ee30cf79918fa8489d9411c98d8f6e5209f18
Output file (CSV)c45cd599c35e2c3383b4065992150363006f4f5294e68b2612925f38ceead7d9
Proof 1 · Screenshot4b26a0e1d82ae1473214ab44fc41c69c34b96d83157a2dfc0010a36f9fc7217a
Proof 2 · Screenshot98c10731051180a8eacaf83e0029deedc8f95b10cb1aaadbb1f0cc207983d4a0
Proof 3 · Screenshot1103d763f3f2abff419ac24c7f315c3173bde9635821396eab5c820ae8e9c306