Can Quizgecko generate quizzes from material with both text and a diagram?
Quizgecko failed this scenario: it returned a 39-question quiz that covered the chapter’s text-based ideas, but it missed the diagram-only food web. The food-web questions stayed abstract and never named the diagram’s unique organisms.
1 of 1 test case failed
Every test case in this scenario has a result.
The test case
Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.
A core idea carried only by a diagramFailEvidence
“generate a quiz covering the supplied material”
The tool's response has no text to quote: it is what the evidence under Proofs shows.
Proof 3 · Screen recording · ▶ 1:16–2:43; ▶ 1:24–1:32
| ✗ | Expected: The quiz should test core ideas from both the text and the diagram, with answers matching the source.Found: It covered the text-based ideas and keyed them correctly, but none of the 39 questions tested the diagram-only food web content. |
It had to cover both the prose and the diagram. The quiz covered the prose topics, but none of the 39 questions named the diagram-only food web or the organisms shown only there, so it is a fail, not a pass.
Raw math markup. The explanations showed a raw math expression instead of rendered mathematics.
Mid-word hyphen. One question showed a mid-word hyphen in the displayed text.
The PDF text layer does not expose the diagram arrows, so the diagram-only links are not available as text.
Configuration and setup
How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.
How this scenario is graded
How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.
Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.
- Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
- Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
- Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.
Where this sits in the benchmark
This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.
| Level | Name | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | Quiz Generation → | 15 scenarios · 10 tools |
| Capability | Quiz Generation → | |
| Scenario | Important information appears in both text and a diagram → | |
| Tool | Quizgecko → |
Global scenario definition → · Global capability definition → · Quizgecko product page →
History of this result
What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.
Act on this result
Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.
You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.
Agree →Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.
Disagree →Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.
Report an issue →Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.
Vendor notice →The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.
Verify the proof files
These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.
File fingerprints (SHA-256)
A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.