Can Quizgecko focus practice on each learner's weaker topic?
Quizgecko focused practice on the weaker topic for each learner. Lavi's review card and first question point to parallel-circuit practice, while Anshika's card and review questions point to series-circuit practice; one Anshika item is shown wrong.
1 of 1 test case passed
Every test case in this scenario has a result.
The test case
Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.
Practice follows the weaker topicPassEvidence
The tool's reply is shown in the evidence under Proofs.
Response 1 Review 11 mistakes Response 2 Review 12 mistakes Response 3 A battery supplies 0.60 A to two parallel branches. One branch carries 0.30 A. What current flows in the other branch? Response 4 Which description identifies components connected in series most precisely?
Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screenshot
Transcribed from Proof 3 · Screenshot
Transcribed from Proof 2 · Screenshot
Transcribed from Proof 5 · Screenshot
| ✓ | Expected: Give each learner practice aimed at the weaker topic, not the same topic regardless of history.Found: Lavi gets parallel-branch current practice and Anshika gets series-circuit practice, matching each learner’s weaker topic rather than repeating one focus. |
Two learners with opposite strengths and weaknesses get different review sets aimed at their weaker topics, so the product behaves as required and this case is a pass.
Wrong answer shown. Anshika's first review item is marked incorrect, and the product shows the chosen pairing as wrong while the correct pairing is marked instead.
Configuration and setup
How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.
How this scenario is graded
How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.
Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.
- Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
- Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
- Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.
Where this sits in the benchmark
This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.
| Level | Name | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | Quiz Generation → | 15 scenarios · 10 tools |
| Capability | Personalized Practice → | |
| Scenario | One topic is weaker than the others → | |
| Tool | Quizgecko → |
Global scenario definition → · Global capability definition → · Quizgecko product page →
History of this result
What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.
Act on this result
Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.
You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.
Agree →Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.
Disagree →Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.
Report an issue →Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.
Vendor notice →The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.
Verify the proof files
These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.
File fingerprints (SHA-256)
A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.