AI Demos Research — the structured-intelligence platform. Every verdict on these pages opens to the execution behind it.
Graded 16 October 2026

Can Quizgecko show what a class struggled with?

Quizgecko does not surface the class's shared weakness in the teacher report. The class view shows 28 completed sessions and a 16% average, while the difficulty/ease panels have blank question rows; both learners' own results are 81% on 53 questions.

1 of 1 test case failed

Every test case in this scenario has a result.

Pass rate0%0 of 1 gradable
Coverage1 of 1test case with a result
0PassNo test case passed.
1FailMissed at least one thing it was expected to do; the reason and proof are on the row.
0Not gradableEvery result here could be graded.
0UntestedEvery test case in this scenario has a result.
The pass rate is a summary. The evidence is the test case below: what we sent, what we checked, what the tool returned, and the proof.

The test case

Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above counts this row.

The class report exposes the shared weaknessFailEvidence
What we sent

No typed message was sent in this test.

What the tool returned

The tool's response has no text to quote: it is what the evidence under Proofs shows.

Proof 1 · Screenshot

Proof 2 · Screenshot

Proof 3 · Screenshot

Proof 4 · Screenshot

Proof 5 · Screenshot

Proof 6 · Screenshot

Proof 7 · Screen recording · ▶ 0:30

Expected vs. Found
✗Expected: The report should match the attempts, show the weaker topic as weaker, make that weakness visible, and not flatten or reverse it with an overall score.Found: The class view shows a 16% average, but the question panels are empty and do not show the weaker parallel-circuit questions; both learner drill-downs show 81% quizzes.
Supporting proof
Proof 1Screenshot
Course report: learner rows and class totals
Open original ↗
Proof 2Screenshot
Analytics tab: class averages and empty question panels
Open original ↗
Proof 3Screenshot
Learner modal: quiz attempts and score history
Open original ↗
Proof 4Screenshot
Answer list: one learner's question-by-question results
Open original ↗
Proof 5Screenshot
Result card: the other learner's completed quiz score
Open original ↗
Proof 6Screenshot
Result card: one learner's completed quiz score
Open original ↗
Proof 7Screen recording
Screen recording: class setup, quiz, and report
Key moments
Open original ↗
Why this result

It is Fail because the class report gives only an overall score and empty difficulty/ease panels instead of a question or topic breakdown, so the shared weakness is not visible.

Also observed on this row

Average includes old tries. The 16% average and 0% pass rate include older 0%, 8% and 42% attempts, not just the two finished quizzes.

Engagement stayed at zero. The analytics view also shows zero flashcard and AI chat activity, and the session table shows dashes in those columns.

Tested by anshika gupta · evidence dated 7 October 2026
Limitations of this result

Only one learner's row-by-row answer list is shown, so the other learner's detailed answers are not visible.

Older practice sessions are included in the class average, so that figure is not based only on the two finished quizzes.

The attempt list continues below the frame, so only nine rows are legible.

Only seven of the 53 answer rows are visible in this capture.

Configuration and setup

How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.

Software that produced the output
Quizgecko
Build or version
N/A — no visible version number found anywhere in the recordings (SaaS web app, no exposed version indicator)
Surface
Web app
Set up before the run
Multiple learners had already completed a valid quiz on distinguishable topics, with stronger performance on one topic and weaker performance on another, and the teacher opened the normal class results/reporting view.
Course sharing
Shared Courses (1) | Electric Circuits: Series and Parallel Wiring | Shared Sep 30, 2026
Tested
7 October 2026 · anshika gupta

How this scenario is graded

How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.

How results are decided

Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.

The rules
  • Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
  • Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the row says which and quotes the tool.
  • Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the row says what's missing.

Where this sits in the benchmark

This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.

LevelNameScope
BenchmarkQuiz Generation →15 scenarios · 10 tools
CapabilityClass Reports →
ScenarioThe teacher checks what the class struggled with →
ToolQuizgecko →

History of this result

What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.

from the publication record
9 October 2026First publishedQuiz Generation v1
29 October 2026Updated — retested
The result is unchanged: 0 pass · 1 fail. The earlier result stays readable. Read the earlier result →

Act on this result

Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.

This matches what I see

You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.

Agree →
This does not match

Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.

Disagree →
Point out an issue

Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.

Report an issue →
Request a retest

On a newer build, a larger dataset, or your own setup.

Request a retest →
We have fixed this

Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.

Vendor notice →
Filed against this evidenceNothing yet. Challenges, counter-evidence and fix notices appear here with their outcome, and stay on the page after they are resolved.
Cite this result
aidemos.com/benchmarks/quiz-generation/results/quizgecko/class-struggle-report · 0 pass · 1 fail · coverage 1/1 · graded 2026-10-16

The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.

Verify the proof files

These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.

Proof 1 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 198 KB
Proof 2 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 212 KB
Proof 3 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 241 KB
Proof 4 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 334 KB
Proof 5 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 115 KB
Proof 6 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 118 KB
File fingerprints (SHA-256)

A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.

Proof 1 · Screenshot7b411e43ff0e8ec8812c4189fda5de878877f81463356fb3dc94f8dfcf141ffe
Proof 2 · Screenshot190c8ad8a9b45a6d257f298b7ee5ba1975b8311a6756712003030feb711d74cf
Proof 3 · Screenshotc7685bafd2b735d4d2d2e256b29cd1ed94d2ed29210a70c9b7e211fe09a41983
Proof 4 · Screenshot9fe42546ed395379c58df80469b1bf801f4c010a7cee375ab1cd19f94ebe676e
Proof 5 · Screenshot21d556f6efa2c4b708fef218d06d1cd1f28b861e84e5608fba91ce27faa395cc
Proof 6 · Screenshot1f3f7647f688d026f9c9144b913d0962fa0f0d04cbc2c4c82bf55f6247ddcc14
Proof 7 · Screen recordingcb8336c7b0bf7dd03535c4eeda2e138ea3b40c6e86c9beb7af0dfed4bf1f6bfa