Can Quizgecko let a learner take a quiz on their own?
Quizgecko let a learner complete and submit a quiz alone. The saved attempt showed 36%, 19 of 53 correct, 53 answered, and a 3m 8s completion time, and answers stayed hidden until submission.
1 of 1 test case passed
Every test case in this scenario has a result.
The test case
Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.
A learner completes and submits a quiz alonePassEvidence
The tool's reply is shown in the evidence under Proofs.
Quiz Complete! Keep trying! You'll do better next time. 36% 19 out of 53 correct 53 Answered 19 Correct 34 Incorrect Streak: 1 days Level 1 +335 XP 335 / 500 XP
Transcribed from Proof 3 · Screenshot
| ✓ | Expected: The learner can finish the quiz once, save that attempt, and not see answer details before submitting.Found: One completed attempt was saved with 36%, 19 of 53 correct, 53 answered, and 3m 8s; before submission, only selection highlights appeared, then answer markers showed after submit. |
The quiz saved one completed attempt and kept answers hidden until submit. The saved attempt and the results page match, and the no-reveal check rests on sampled frames.
Configuration and setup
How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.
How this scenario is graded
How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.
Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.
- Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
- Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
- Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.
Where this sits in the benchmark
This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.
| Level | Name | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | Quiz Generation → | 15 scenarios · 10 tools |
| Capability | Quiz Delivery → | |
| Scenario | A learner takes a quiz on their own → | |
| Tool | Quizgecko → |
Global scenario definition → · Global capability definition → · Quizgecko product page →
History of this result
What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.
Act on this result
Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.
You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.
Agree →Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.
Disagree →Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.
Report an issue →Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.
Vendor notice →The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.
Verify the proof files
These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.
File fingerprints (SHA-256)
A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.