AI Demos Research — the structured-intelligence platform. Every verdict on these pages opens to the execution behind it.
Graded 7 October 2026

Can AskYourDatabase put several findings together in one response?

AskYourDatabase put the three findings into one combined chat reply, and the figures matched the earlier direct answers. The report was a formatted assistant reply, not a saved file. It reported revenue excluding cancelled orders, Home Decor as the best-selling category by units, and both order and subscription cancellation rates.

1 of 1 test case passed

Every test case in this scenario has a result.

Pass rate100%1 of 1 gradable
Coverage1 of 1test case with a result
1PassDid everything it was expected to do.
0FailNo test case failed.
0Not gradableEvery result here could be graded.
0UntestedEvery test case in this scenario has a result.
The pass rate is a summary. The evidence is the test case below: what we sent, what we checked, what the tool returned, and the proof.

The test case

Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.

Three findings assembled into one artifactPassEvidence
What we sent

Input 1: “As of September 2, 2026, what was our total revenue last month?”

Input 2: “What's our best-selling product category?”

Input 3: “What's our current cancellation rate?”

Input 4: “Put all of that together into one report.”

What the tool returned

The tool's reply is shown in the screenshot under Proof.

Expected vs. Found
✓Expected: One artifact containing all of them, each still agreeing with the same question asked directly.Found: One assistant reply contained all three findings, and each figure matched the direct answer shown earlier.
Supporting proof
Proof 1Screen recording
A chat session with three direct answers followed by a combined business report.
Key moments
Open original ↗
Why this result

The chat was checked for one combined report that still matched the earlier direct answers. The final assistant reply contained revenue, best-selling category, and cancellation rates, and the figures matched the direct answers shown earlier.

Also observed in this test case

Report in chat. The combined result appeared as a formatted chat reply, with only copy and print controls beneath it, so it was not shown as a saved file.

Extra detail included. Revenue was given after excluding cancelled orders. The answer also reported both order and subscription cancellation rates, and it noted that Furniture led on revenue.

Tested by Ayush Ghosh · evidence dated 7 October 2026

Configuration and setup

How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.

Software that produced the output
AskYourDatabase
Build or version
Not exposed by the hosted product
Model
Claude-Sonnet-5
Surface
Web app
Set up before the run
The measures are related but distinct, and each had its own reference answer.
Thinking mode
unchecked
Database type
PostgreSQL
Tested
7 October 2026 · Ayush Ghosh

How this scenario is graded

How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.

How results are decided

Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.

The rules
  • Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
  • Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
  • Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.

Where this sits in the benchmark

This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.

LevelNameScope
BenchmarkAI Database Agents →28 scenarios · 4 tools
CapabilityReporting →
ScenarioThe user wants several findings in one place →
ToolAskYourDatabase →

History of this result

What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.

from the publication record
14 October 2026First publishedAI Database Agents v1

Act on this result

Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.

This matches what I see

You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.

Agree →
This does not match

Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.

Disagree →
Point out an issue

Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.

Report an issue →
Request a retest

On a newer build, a larger dataset, or your own setup.

Request a retest →
We have fixed this

Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.

Vendor notice →
Filed against this evidenceNothing yet. Challenges, counter-evidence and fix notices appear here with their outcome, and stay on the page after they are resolved.
Cite this result
aidemos.com/benchmarks/ai-database-agents/results/askyourdatabase/the-user-wants-several-findings-in-one-place · 1 pass · 0 fail · coverage 1/1 · graded 2026-10-07

The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.

Verify the proof files

These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.

File fingerprints (SHA-256)

A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.

Proof 1 · Screen recording2ee4cb7771cbad950fcf3f601b6b7b74ddf42456750d0743de44fc4b56e9fe34