AI Demos Research — the structured-intelligence platform. Every verdict on these pages opens to the execution behind it.
Graded 17 October 2026

Does AskYourDatabase preserve a report’s relative period when it is rerun after data changes?

AskYourDatabase answered the relative-period order question, but no save control was found for rerunning the answer as a report after data changed. The answer actions offered copying and PDF printing.

1 of 1 test case failed

Every test case in this scenario has a result.

Pass rate0%0 of 1 gradable
Coverage1 of 1test case with a result
0PassNo test case passed.
1FailMissed at least one thing it was expected to do; the reason and proof are with each test case below.
0Not gradableEvery result here could be graded.
0UntestedEvery test case in this scenario has a result.
The pass rate is a summary. The evidence is the test case below: what we sent, what we checked, what the tool returned, and the proof.

The test case

Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.

Saved report re-run after new rowsFailEvidence
What we sent

“Show me the number of orders placed in the last 30 days, as of September 2, 2026.”

What the tool returned

21 orders were placed in the 30 days leading up to September 2, 2026 (i.e., between August 3 and September 2, 2026), excluding cancelled orders.

Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screenshot

Every message the tool sent, in order (3)
  1. Query progress

    I'll query the database for orders placed in the last 30 days as of September 2, 2026.

  2. Generated SQL · not part of the answer
    SELECT COUNT(*) AS order_count
    FROM orders
    WHERE status != 'cancelled'
      AND placed_at >= '2026-09-02'::timestamp - INTERVAL '30 days'
      AND placed_at < '2026-09-02'::timestamp
  3. Answer

    The final response, printed above.

Expected vs. Found
✗Expected: After rows are added, rerun the saved report using the same relative period and return the updated correct answer.Found: No save or report control was found beneath the answer or across the bot, dashboard, data-source, billing, API-key and general settings pages.
Supporting proof
Proof 1Screenshot
Chat screenshot: the relative-period order question, SQL query and answer
Open original ↗
Proof 2Screen recording
Screen recording: no answer-saving control across answer actions, settings and dashboards
Key moments
Open original ↗
Why this result

The required refresh needed a saved answer. The question received an answer, so missing report-saving capability—not an execution fault—prevented progress. PDF printing is static, and the dashboard builder uses a database structure and description rather than saving chat answers.

Also observed in this test case

End-date wording. The order-count answer names September 2, 2026 as the end date; its query excludes that date, making the stated end date one day later than the query’s.

Tested by Ayush Ghosh · evidence dated 7 October 2026

Configuration and setup

How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.

Software that produced the output
AskYourDatabase
Build or version
Not exposed by the hosted product
Model
Claude-Sonnet-5
Surface
Web app
Set up before the run
The test called for saving an order-count answer for the last 30 days as of September 2, 2026, adding rows inside that period and rerunning it. Saving was unavailable, so adding rows and rerunning were not reached.
Database type
PostgreSQL
Tested
7 October 2026 · Ayush Ghosh

How this scenario is graded

How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.

How results are decided

Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.

The rules
  • Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
  • Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
  • Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.

Where this sits in the benchmark

This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.

History of this result

What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.

from the publication record
12 November 2026First publishedAI Database Agents v1

Act on this result

Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.

This matches what I see

You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.

Agree →
This does not match

Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.

Disagree →
Point out an issue

Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.

Report an issue →
Request a retest

On a newer build, a larger dataset, or your own setup.

Request a retest →
We have fixed this

Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.

Vendor notice →
Filed against this evidenceNothing yet. Challenges, counter-evidence and fix notices appear here with their outcome, and stay on the page after they are resolved.
Cite this result
aidemos.com/benchmarks/ai-database-agents/results/askyourdatabase/relative-date-report · 0 pass · 1 fail · coverage 1/1 · graded 2026-10-17

The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.

Verify the proof files

These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.

Proof 1 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 49 KB
File fingerprints (SHA-256)

A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.

Proof 1 · Screenshot471e1f95ae06e189742a8d687f5d3b9a09d698f701b64a4514b60ca504200da3
Proof 2 · Screen recording566aaaeb93373bcf083ab792c06e890ad81e62ab7a9d8c4854251142aa6f6b04