AI Demos Research — the structured-intelligence platform. Every verdict on these pages opens to the execution behind it.
Graded 8 October 2026

Does AskYourDatabase report analytics that match what actually happened?

AskYourDatabase's reported totals matched what actually happened in this run. Person 1 showed 3 conversations and Person 2 showed 2, and both included unanswered questions; the five-message list in the capture matches the five questions that were run.

1 of 1 test case passed

Every test case in this scenario has a result.

Pass rate100%1 of 1 gradable
Coverage1 of 1test case with a result
1PassDid everything it was expected to do.
0FailNo test case failed.
0Not gradableEvery result here could be graded.
0UntestedEvery test case in this scenario has a result.
The pass rate is a summary. The evidence is the test case below: what we sent, what we checked, what the tool returned, and the proof.

The test case

Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.

Reported totals include the unansweredPassEvidence
What we sent

Input 1: “As of September 2, 2026, what's our total revenue in the last 30 days?”

Input 2: “What's our most common payment method?”

Input 3: “How many complaints have we received on social media this month?”

Input 4: “How many customers currently have an active subscription?”

Input 5: “What's our net promoter score for last quarter?”

What the tool returned

The tool's reply is shown in the screenshots under Proofs.

Expected vs. Found
✓Expected: The reported counts match what was run, including unanswered questions.Found: Person 1 showed 3 conversations and Person 2 showed 2, and both refusals were counted.
Supporting proof
Proof 1Screen recording
Screen recording showing the two account views, the conversation counts, and the refusal replies.
Key moments
Open original ↗
Proof 2Screenshot
Person 1 account screenshot with five messages, the complaints question, and the refusal reply.
Open original ↗
Proof 3Screenshot
Person 1 account screenshot with a History count of 3 conversations and five messages.
Open original ↗
Proof 4Screenshot
Person 2 account screenshot with a History count of 2 conversations and the NPS chat.
Open original ↗
Proof 5Screen recording
Settings and other pages, plus a different chat.
Open original ↗
Why this result

The per-account History counter matched the run in both accounts. Person 1 showed 3 conversations and Person 2 showed 2, and the complaints and NPS refusals were counted with the answered chats.

Also observed in this test case

Per-account totals. The total is separate for each account; the product never reports one combined total across both accounts.

Counts chats, not questions. Each question was asked in its own chat, so the conversation count matches the number of questions here.

Refusals are counted. The unanswered questions are counted together with the answered ones.

Tested by Ayush Ghosh · evidence dated 7 October 2026

Configuration and setup

How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.

Software that produced the output
AskYourDatabase
Build or version
Not exposed by the hosted product
Surface
Web app
Set up before the run
The run needed a mix of questions the product could answer and questions it could not. The product was run on that mix, then its reported totals were read.
Tested
7 October 2026 · Ayush Ghosh

How this scenario is graded

How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.

How results are decided

Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.

The rules
  • Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
  • Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
  • Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.

Where this sits in the benchmark

This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.

History of this result

What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.

from the publication record
13 October 2026First publishedAI Database Agents v1

Act on this result

Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.

This matches what I see

You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.

Agree →
This does not match

Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.

Disagree →
Point out an issue

Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.

Report an issue →
Request a retest

On a newer build, a larger dataset, or your own setup.

Request a retest →
We have fixed this

Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.

Vendor notice →
Filed against this evidenceNothing yet. Challenges, counter-evidence and fix notices appear here with their outcome, and stay on the page after they are resolved.
Cite this result
aidemos.com/benchmarks/ai-database-agents/results/askyourdatabase/analytics-accuracy · 1 pass · 0 fail · coverage 1/1 · graded 2026-10-08

The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.

Verify the proof files

These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.

Proof 2 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 239 KB
Proof 3 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 194 KB
Proof 4 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 185 KB
File fingerprints (SHA-256)

A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.

Proof 1 · Screen recording81ccb36e75b2c9a6681bdc6406e154992d582c7430c2583608dc24d75ba3eddf
Proof 2 · Screenshot5a844f04cb894d74c94b75530322bc998d158034c2e133d82460945e4164343e
Proof 3 · Screenshotd33f714028321a404f4707de5e955d2ff45103a9b4d2c72f664cf7e8f313491b
Proof 4 · Screenshot7a9cce825ca6bdd7a4024d56081770303ac74985e331768def404edfc277e3e1
Proof 5 · Screen recording566aaaeb93373bcf083ab792c06e890ad81e62ab7a9d8c4854251142aa6f6b04