AI Demos Research — the structured-intelligence platform. Every verdict on these pages opens to the execution behind it.
Graded 16 October 2026

Does Kommunicate update its answers when a customer corrects earlier information?

Kommunicate passed this conversation-continuity case: after the customer corrected the order number, it answered only about the new order and dropped the first one. The final reply names 41830 and leaves out 41982.

1 of 1 test case passed

Every test case in this scenario has a result.

Pass rate100%1 of 1 gradable
Coverage1 of 1test case with a result
1PassDid everything it was expected to do.
0FailNo test case failed.
0Not gradableEvery result here could be graded.
0UntestedEvery test case in this scenario has a result.
The pass rate is a summary. The evidence is the test case below: what we sent, what we checked, what the tool returned, and the proof.

The test case

Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.

Wrong order number corrected at t2PassEvidence
What we sent

Input 1 · Original order number: “Where is order 41982?”

Input 2 · Corrected order number: “Sorry, wrong number - it's 41830”

What the tool returned

Response 1 answers Input 1.

Response 2, the final response, answers Input 2.

Order #41830 is currently "processing". Estimated delivery: Wednesday, September 9, 2026.

Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screenshot

Every message the tool sent, in order (2)
  1. Answer for order 41982

    Order #41982 is currently "shipped". Tracking number: 1Z999AA10123456784 (UPS). Estimated delivery: Thursday, September 3, 2026.

  2. Answer for order 41830

    The final response, printed above.

Expected vs. Found
✓Expected: Answer about the corrected order and drop the first orderFound: The second reply is only about 41830 and leaves out 41982, including its shipped status, tracking number, and September 3 date.
Supporting proof
Proof 1Screenshot
Chat screenshot showing a wrong order number corrected to a different order
Open original ↗
Why this result

It answered the corrected order and left out the first one, so the later correction controlled the reply. The final answer is only about 41830 and gives none of 41982's details.

Also observed in this test case

Canned opener. The opening bot message and quick-reply chips appeared before the customer's first message; they were the bot's canned opener, not a reply to the test.

Tested by Ajay Vekhande · evidence dated 9 September 2026

Configuration and setup

How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.

Software that produced the output
Kommunicate
Build or version
Not exposed by the hosted product
Plan or tier
Enterprise
Surface
Web app
Set up before the run
Two real orders had to exist in the store's order system.
Tested
9 September 2026 · Ajay Vekhande

How this scenario is graded

How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.

How results are decided

Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.

The rules
  • Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
  • Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
  • Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.

Where this sits in the benchmark

This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.

History of this result

What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.

from the publication record
10 November 2026First publishedAI Customer Support Chatbots v1

Act on this result

Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.

This matches what I see

You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.

Agree →
This does not match

Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.

Disagree →
Point out an issue

Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.

Report an issue →
Request a retest

On a newer build, a larger dataset, or your own setup.

Request a retest →
We have fixed this

Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.

Vendor notice →
Filed against this evidenceNothing yet. Challenges, counter-evidence and fix notices appear here with their outcome, and stay on the page after they are resolved.
Cite this result
aidemos.com/benchmarks/ai-customer-support-chatbots/results/kommunicate/customer-corrects-information-given-earlier · 1 pass · 0 fail · coverage 1/1 · graded 2026-10-16

The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.

Verify the proof files

These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.

Proof 1 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 48 KB
File fingerprints (SHA-256)

A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.

Proof 1 · Screenshotab0c03f0f18b9a555fb656362660f52a6a8e5fb325acbaff43a9441b3486a81d
Does Kommunicate update its answers when a customer corrects earlier information? — Kommunicate | AI Demos Research