AI Demos Research — the structured-intelligence platform. Every verdict on these pages opens to the execution behind it.
Graded 9 October 2026

Can Freshdesk Freddy use earlier conversation information later?

Freshdesk Freddy did not keep earlier conversation details available for the follow-up. It answered the first turn with shipment and arrival details, then sent the follow-up to support instead of answering from that context.

1 of 1 test case failed

Every test case in this scenario has a result.

Pass rate0%0 of 1 gradable
Coverage1 of 1test case with a result
0PassNo test case passed.
1FailMissed at least one thing it was expected to do; the reason and proof are with each test case below.
0Not gradableEvery result here could be graded.
0UntestedEvery test case in this scenario has a result.
The pass rate is a summary. The evidence is the test case below: what we sent, what we checked, what the tool returned, and the proof.

The test case

Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.

Order number given at t1, needed at t2FailEvidence
What we sent

Input 1: “My order is 41982”

Input 2: “When it will arrive?”

What the tool returned

The tool's reply is shown in the evidence under Proof.

Response 1 replies to Input 1.

Response 2 replies to Input 2.

Response to input 1 Your order 41982 has been shipped. It's a Linen sheet set in Fog Grey going to 1470 Blake Street, Apt 6B, Denver, CO 80202, and it's expected to arrive by September 3, 2026. If you'd like, I can share the carrier and tracking number next. Response to input 2 Sure! I'm connecting you with one of our support agents now — this conversation has been made available for a live agent to pick up and they'll be with you shortly.

Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screen recording at 0:03

Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screen recording at 0:15

Expected vs. Found
✗Expected: Answer the follow-up using the earlier order number without asking again.Found: It did not ask for the number again, but it also did not answer the arrival question.
Supporting proof
Proof 1Screen recording
Screen recording: shipment reply, follow-up question, and support handoff
Key moments
Open original ↗
Why this result

The follow-up had to use the earlier order context. After giving shipment and arrival details on the first turn, it sent the customer to support on the second turn instead of answering the arrival question; preview mode only limits what happens after that handoff.

Also observed in this test case

Volunteered extras. The first reply also volunteered the delivery address and offered to share carrier and tracking.

Tested by Ajay Vekhande · evidence dated 5 September 2026

Configuration and setup

How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.

Software that produced the output
Freshdesk Freddy
Build or version
Not exposed by the hosted product
Plan or tier
Free Enterprise trial
Surface
Web app
Set up before the run
A shipped order had to be available for the chat.
AI agent
Cedarline
Preview mode
AI Agent Preview mode
Tested
5 September 2026 · Ajay Vekhande

How this scenario is graded

How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.

How results are decided

Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.

The rules
  • Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
  • Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
  • Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.

Where this sits in the benchmark

This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.

History of this result

What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.

from the publication record
15 October 2026First publishedAI Customer Support Chatbots v1

Act on this result

Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.

This matches what I see

You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.

Agree →
This does not match

Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.

Disagree →
Point out an issue

Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.

Report an issue →
Request a retest

On a newer build, a larger dataset, or your own setup.

Request a retest →
We have fixed this

Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.

Vendor notice →
Filed against this evidenceNothing yet. Challenges, counter-evidence and fix notices appear here with their outcome, and stay on the page after they are resolved.
Cite this result
aidemos.com/benchmarks/ai-customer-support-chatbots/results/freshdesk/conversation-context-retention · 0 pass · 1 fail · coverage 1/1 · graded 2026-10-09

The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.

Verify the proof files

These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.

File fingerprints (SHA-256)

A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.

Proof 1 · Screen recording12507edb7cbe9f122e2c358b02616d7ec852c0619c88de1c156b141d3d33b9ad