AI Demos Research — the structured-intelligence platform. Every verdict on these pages opens to the execution behind it.
Graded 9 October 2026

Can Botpress take a correction from a customer?

Botpress took a submitted correction in this scenario. The correction was entered and submitted, and the returned draft fix said it would omit the AI disclosure and keep the response focused; the capture stops before any applied answer is shown.

1 of 1 test case passed

Every test case in this scenario has a result.

Pass rate100%1 of 1 gradable
Coverage1 of 1test case with a result
1PassDid everything it was expected to do.
0FailNo test case failed.
0Not gradableEvery result here could be graded.
0UntestedEvery test case in this scenario has a result.
The pass rate is a summary. The evidence is the test case below: what we sent, what we checked, what the tool returned, and the proof.

The test case

Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.

Submit a correction for one wrong answerPassEvidence
What we sent

“No need to mention that you are Cedarline's AI assistant. Also, don't need to mention the return policy details. Keep the response related to query”

What the tool returned

The tool's reply is shown in the evidence under Proof.

Response to input 1 (message 1 of 2) Asked Vibe to improve the flagged response Response to input 1 (message 2 of 2) Would you like to apply this draft fix?

Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screen recording at 1:32

Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screen recording at 1:40

Expected vs. Found
✓Expected: The product takes the feedback/correctionFound: The correction was entered and submitted; Botpress acknowledged it by asking to improve the flagged response and returning a draft fix.
Supporting proof
Proof 1Screen recording
Screen recording: the flagged answer, correction dialog, and draft fix
Key moments
Open original ↗
Why this result

The case required Botpress to take a correction. It did: the correction was entered, the submission progressed, and the product replied with a draft fix. The recording ends before any fixed answer is applied.

Also observed in this test case

Draft fix covered edits. The draft fix covered both requested edits in its wording, but the recording stops before any applied answer is shown.

Tested by Ajay Vekhande · evidence dated 24 September 2026
Limitations of this result

The capture stops at the draft-fix prompt, so the final answer is not shown.

The recording ends before any fixed answer is shown.

Configuration and setup

How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.

Software that produced the output
Botpress
Build or version
Not exposed by the hosted product
Plan or tier
Free plan
Surface
Web app
Set up before the run
A prior conversation already had one wrong answer, and one correction was submitted against it through the product.
Sources
Not sure / none
Tested
24 September 2026 · Ajay Vekhande

How this scenario is graded

How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.

How results are decided

Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.

The rules
  • Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
  • Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
  • Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.

Where this sits in the benchmark

This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.

LevelNameScope
BenchmarkAI Customer Support Chatbots →26 scenarios · 13 tools
CapabilityFeedback and learning →
ScenarioFeedback can be submitted →
ToolBotpress →

History of this result

What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.

from the publication record
12 October 2026First publishedAI Customer Support Chatbots v1

Act on this result

Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.

This matches what I see

You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.

Agree →
This does not match

Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.

Disagree →
Point out an issue

Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.

Report an issue →
Request a retest

On a newer build, a larger dataset, or your own setup.

Request a retest →
We have fixed this

Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.

Vendor notice →
Filed against this evidenceNothing yet. Challenges, counter-evidence and fix notices appear here with their outcome, and stay on the page after they are resolved.
Cite this result
aidemos.com/benchmarks/ai-customer-support-chatbots/results/botpress/feedback-can-be-submitted · 1 pass · 0 fail · coverage 1/1 · graded 2026-10-09

The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.

Verify the proof files

These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.

File fingerprints (SHA-256)

A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.

Proof 1 · Screen recordingb34a53c426ce3f66e373bd2f088defa7e6254a3830350463c139e1fb5878d548