AI Demos Research — the structured-intelligence platform. Every verdict on these pages opens to the execution behind it.
Graded 18 October 2026

Can Botpress use earlier conversation context later?

Botpress kept earlier conversation context across the two turns. The second reply used the first turn's order number to give the delivery date and tracking number, and it did not ask for the number again.

1 of 1 test case passed

Every test case in this scenario has a result.

Pass rate100%1 of 1 gradable
Coverage1 of 1test case with a result
1PassDid everything it was expected to do.
0FailNo test case failed.
0Not gradableEvery result here could be graded.
0UntestedEvery test case in this scenario has a result.
The pass rate is a summary. The evidence is the test case below: what we sent, what we checked, what the tool returned, and the proof.

The test case

Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.

Order number given at t1, needed at t2PassEvidence
What we sent

Input 1: “My order number is 41982”

Input 2: “When will it arrive?”

What the tool returned

Response 1 answers Input 1.

Response 2, the final response, answers Input 2.

Response 3, the final response, answers Input 2.

The estimated delivery date was September 3, 2026, so your order is now delayed. Its current status is shipped, with tracking number 1Z999AA10123456784. I'll route this as a shipping issue for further assistance. This shipment is significantly overdue, so it needs human assistance. I'm handing this over now with the order and tracking details. Your conversation has been transferred to a human agent. They should be with you shortly.

Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screenshot

Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screenshot

Every message the tool sent, in order (3)
  1. Response to input 1

    Hi Alice! Let me look up your order details. Your order #41982 has been shipped! Here are the details: Item: Linen sheet set, queen - Fog Grey Status: Shipped Carrier: UPS Tracking Number: 1Z999AA10123456784 Estimated Delivery: September 3, 2026 Delivery Address: 1470 Blake Street, Apt 6B, Denver, CO 80202 You can track your package with UPS using the tracking number above. Since your order has already shipped, the delivery address can't be changed at this point. Is there anything else I can help you with regarding this order?

  2. Final response (message 1 of 2)

    The estimated delivery date was September 3, 2026, so your order is now delayed. Its current status is shipped, with tracking number 1Z999AA10123456784. I'll route this as a shipping issue for further assistance. This shipment is significantly overdue, so it needs human assistance. I'm handing this over now with the order and tracking details.

  3. Final response (message 2 of 2)

    Your conversation has been transferred to a human agent. They should be with you shortly.

Expected vs. Found
✓Expected: Answers the second message using the first turn's order number without asking for it again.Found: The second reply used the first turn's order number to give the delivery date and tracking number without asking for it again.
Supporting proof
Proof 1Screenshot
Chat screenshot: both turns and replies in order
Open original ↗
Why this result

It is a Pass, not a miss: the second reply used the earlier order number and gave the shipment details without asking for it again.

Also observed in this test case

Human transfer. After the second reply, the chat was transferred to a human agent.

Tested by Ajay Vekhande · evidence dated 18 September 2026

Configuration and setup

How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.

Software that produced the output
Botpress
Build or version
Not exposed by the hosted product
Plan or tier
Free plan
Surface
Web app
Set up before the run
A shipped order had to be in place for the chat.
Bot
Cedarline
Configuration
Cedarline bot, default conversation settings
Tested
18 September 2026 · Ajay Vekhande

How this scenario is graded

How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.

How results are decided

Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.

The rules
  • Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
  • Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
  • Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.

Where this sits in the benchmark

This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.

History of this result

What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.

from the publication record
8 October 2026First publishedAI Customer Support Chatbots v1
2 November 2026Updated — retested
The result is unchanged: 1 pass · 0 fail. The earlier result stays readable. Read the earlier result →

Act on this result

Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.

This matches what I see

You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.

Agree →
This does not match

Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.

Disagree →
Point out an issue

Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.

Report an issue →
Request a retest

On a newer build, a larger dataset, or your own setup.

Request a retest →
We have fixed this

Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.

Vendor notice →
Filed against this evidenceNothing yet. Challenges, counter-evidence and fix notices appear here with their outcome, and stay on the page after they are resolved.
Cite this result
aidemos.com/benchmarks/ai-customer-support-chatbots/results/botpress/conversation-context-retention · 1 pass · 0 fail · coverage 1/1 · graded 2026-10-18

The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.

Verify the proof files

These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.

Proof 1 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 56 KB
File fingerprints (SHA-256)

A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.

Proof 1 · Screenshot4039ccd184d0be9ccdb6c85c8343fe0c952a3cd80a57d192b191191e2ca5ea64